Jamie Macbeth
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Co-authors
- Desmond U. PattonMargaret BurnettIrwin KwanStephann MakriLaura BeckwithAnicia PetersSimone StumpfRobin M. Kowalski
- Topics
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers)Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers)Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNew Media & SocietyAmerican Journal of Orthopsychiatry
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jamie Macbeth
25 papers receiving 572 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Artificial Intelligence 195
- Social Psychology 184
- Information Systems 127
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Computer Science Applications 72
Countries citing papers authored by Jamie Macbeth
This map shows the geographic impact of Jamie Macbeth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamie Macbeth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamie Macbeth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jamie Macbeth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamie Macbeth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamie Macbeth. The network helps show where Jamie Macbeth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jamie Macbeth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jamie Macbeth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jamie Macbeth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jamie Macbeth. Jamie Macbeth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 35 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | Crowdsourcing Image Schemas | 1 |
| 5 | Image Schemas and Conceptual Dependency Primitives: A Comparison | 2 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Automatically Processing Tweets from Gang-Involved Youth: Towards Detecting Loss and Aggression. | 19 |
| 8 | 86 | |
| 9 | 163 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | Modeling the Impact of Operator Trust on Performance in Multiple Robot Control | 15 |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Jamie Macbeth
Jamie Macbeth is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Computer Science Applications and General Social Sciences, having authored 26 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (72 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (66 citations) and Communication (64 citations). Jamie Macbeth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Desmond U. Patton, Margaret Burnett, Irwin Kwan, Stephann Makri, Laura Beckwith, Anicia Peters, Simone Stumpf, Robin M. Kowalski, Jeffrey Lane and Feng Luo. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, New Media & Society and American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.