Amber Horvath

734 total citations
20 papers, 498 citations indexed

About

Amber Horvath is a scholar working on Information Systems, Computer Science Applications and Software. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber Horvath has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 498 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Information Systems, 12 papers in Computer Science Applications and 4 papers in Software. Recurrent topics in Amber Horvath's work include Software Engineering Research (12 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (10 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (7 papers). Amber Horvath is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Research (12 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (10 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (7 papers). Amber Horvath collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Brazil. Amber Horvath's co-authors include Brad A. Myers, Mary Beth Kery, Margaret Burnett, Charles G. Hill, Christopher Mendez, Anita Sarma, Claudia Hilderbrand, Irwin Kwan, Bonnie E. John and Zoe Steine-Hanson and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction and Journal of Visual Languages & Computing.

In The Last Decade

Amber Horvath

20 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Amber Horvath
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Computer Science Applications 265
  • Information Systems 246
  • Information Systems and Management 113
  • Artificial Intelligence 84
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 74
Replace Jill Cao with:
Jill Cao United States
Miguel L. Bote‐Lorenzo Spain
Steven Ross United States
Hussein Suleman South Africa
Eric Wilcox United States
David Piorkowski United States
Alexey Zagalsky Canada
Fernando Figueira Filho Brazil
Fabio Calefato Italy
Heather Richter United States
Jill Cao United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Amber Horvath
Amber Horvath · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Amber Horvath
Amber Horvath · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Horvath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Horvath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Horvath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Horvath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Horvath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Horvath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Horvath. The network helps show where Amber Horvath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber Horvath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber Horvath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber Horvath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber Horvath. Amber Horvath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 4
2 3
3 4
4 14
5 9
6 35
7 7
8 56
9 8
10 11
11 6
12 92
13
Open Source barriers to entry, revisited : a tools perspective
6
14 7
15 96
16 13
17 31
18 22
19 64
20 10

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026