Aneeta Rattan
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Education top 1%
- Safety Research top 1%
- Co-authors
- Carol S. DweckCatherine GoodKrishna SavaniNalini AmbadyDolly ChughJennifer L. EberhardtN. V. NaiduGeraldine Downey
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (19 papers)Gender Diversity and Inequality (14 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Aneeta Rattan
37 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Social Psychology 907
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 804
- Sociology and Political Science 791
- Education 654
- Safety Research 458
Countries citing papers authored by Aneeta Rattan
This map shows the geographic impact of Aneeta Rattan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aneeta Rattan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aneeta Rattan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aneeta Rattan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aneeta Rattan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aneeta Rattan. The network helps show where Aneeta Rattan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aneeta Rattan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aneeta Rattan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aneeta Rattan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aneeta Rattan. Aneeta Rattan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | The business case for diversity backfires: Detrimental effects of organizations’ instrumental diversity rhetoric for underrepresented group members’ sense of belonging.breakdown → | 70 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 55 | |
| 13 | 87 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 54 | |
| 17 | 93 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics.breakdown → | 708 |
| 20 | 111 |
About Aneeta Rattan
Aneeta Rattan is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (19 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (14 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (804 citations), Safety Research (458 citations) and Gender Studies (449 citations). Aneeta Rattan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Carol S. Dweck, Catherine Good, Krishna Savani, Nalini Ambady, Dolly Chugh, Jennifer L. Eberhardt, N. V. Naidu, Geraldine Downey, Diana F. Tyson and Rainer Romero‐Canyas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Journal of Applied Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.