A. Cuthbertson

1.5k total citations
41 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

A. Cuthbertson is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Cuthbertson has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 14 papers in Genetics and 9 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in A. Cuthbertson's work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (27 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (14 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (13 papers). A. Cuthbertson is often cited by papers focused on Meat and Animal Product Quality (27 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (14 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (13 papers). A. Cuthbertson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. A. Cuthbertson's co-authors include A. J. Kempster, G. Harrington, Richard J. Smith, R. W. Pomeroy, Trevor W. Scott, J.R. Ashes, S.K. Gulati, G.A.J. Fursey, J.D. Wood and G.R. Nute and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal Of Nutrition, Meat Science and Computers and Electronics in Agriculture.

In The Last Decade

A. Cuthbertson

41 papers receiving 945 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. Cuthbertson United Kingdom 18 836 478 451 179 172 41 1.2k
A. J. Kempster United Kingdom 27 1.6k 1.9× 1.2k 2.5× 778 1.7× 424 2.4× 87 0.5× 77 2.1k
C. Pérez Spain 20 1.0k 1.2× 327 0.7× 423 0.9× 83 0.5× 180 1.0× 40 1.3k
G. M. Innes 11 288 0.3× 171 0.4× 478 1.1× 108 0.6× 58 0.3× 23 729
S. G. May United States 13 595 0.7× 245 0.5× 261 0.6× 38 0.2× 168 1.0× 15 803
Felipe Ruiz de Huidobro Spain 14 983 1.2× 324 0.7× 378 0.8× 51 0.3× 154 0.9× 28 1.2k
G. H. Wellington United States 13 478 0.6× 170 0.4× 147 0.3× 59 0.3× 83 0.5× 30 685
J. H. Ziegler United States 14 339 0.4× 204 0.4× 154 0.3× 69 0.4× 44 0.3× 40 554
M. Thériez France 12 380 0.5× 196 0.4× 285 0.6× 50 0.3× 53 0.3× 60 641
R. Moncoulon France 17 266 0.3× 392 0.8× 992 2.2× 60 0.3× 276 1.6× 35 1.2k
R. Volcani Israel 16 231 0.3× 170 0.4× 320 0.7× 75 0.4× 102 0.6× 49 719

Countries citing papers authored by A. Cuthbertson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Cuthbertson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Cuthbertson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Cuthbertson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Cuthbertson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Cuthbertson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Cuthbertson. The network helps show where A. Cuthbertson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Cuthbertson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Cuthbertson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Cuthbertson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Cuthbertson. A. Cuthbertson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cuthbertson, A.. (2000). ISO 9000:2000 - impact in a large organisation. 2000. 6–6. 4 indexed citations
2.
Sinclair, Kevin D., A. Cuthbertson, Guy A. Rutter, & M. F. Franklin. (1998). The effects of age at slaughter, genotype and finishing system on the organoleptic properties and texture of bull beef from suckled calves. Animal Science. 66(2). 329–340. 27 indexed citations
3.
Wood, J.D., G.R. Nute, G.A.J. Fursey, & A. Cuthbertson. (1995). The effect of cooking conditions on the eating quality of pork. Meat Science. 40(2). 127–135. 94 indexed citations
4.
Cuthbertson, A., et al.. (1994). Eating quality of beef from different breeds. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972). 1994. 179–179. 2 indexed citations
5.
Fisher, A.V., et al.. (1992). The relative effects of animal production and carcass processing factors on beef tenderness. Explore Bristol Research. 1 indexed citations
6.
Cuthbertson, A., et al.. (1984). A subaperture approach to the calculation of flashlobes introduced by airborne radomes. 33–39. 1 indexed citations
7.
Andersen, B. B., Hans Busk, J. P. Chadwick, et al.. (1983). Comparison of ultrasonic equipment for describing beef carcass characteristics in live cattle (Report on a joint ultrasonic trial carried out in the U.K. and Denmark). Livestock Production Science. 10(2). 133–147. 10 indexed citations
8.
Kempster, A. J., A. Cuthbertson, & G. Harrington. (1982). The relationship between conformation and the yield and distribution of lean meat in the carcasses of British pigs, cattle and sheep: A review. Meat Science. 6(1). 37–53. 40 indexed citations
9.
Kempster, A. J., A. Cuthbertson, & Richard J. Smith. (1981). A national survey of the weight loss in pig carcasses between slaughter and 24 hours post mortem. Meat Science. 5(5). 383–387. 2 indexed citations
10.
Kempster, A. J., et al.. (1981). Prediction of body composition of live cattle using two ultrasonic machines of differing complexity: a report of four separate trials. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 96(2). 301–307. 22 indexed citations
11.
Kempster, A. J., D. W. Jones, & A. Cuthbertson. (1979). A comparison of the Danish MFA, Ulster and optical probes for use in pig carcass classification and grading. Meat Science. 3(2). 109–120. 11 indexed citations
12.
13.
Kempster, A. J., A. Cuthbertson, & G. Harrington. (1976). Fat distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. 1. Distribution between depots. Animal Science. 23(1). 25–34. 70 indexed citations
14.
Kempster, A. J., A. Cuthbertson, & Richard J. Smith. (1976). Variation in lean distribution among steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 87(3). 533–542. 36 indexed citations
15.
Kempster, A. J., et al.. (1976). Prediction of the lean content of lamb carcasses of different breed types. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 86(1). 23–34. 58 indexed citations
16.
MacDougall, Douglas B., A. Cuthbertson, & Richard J. Smith. (1969). The assessment of pig meat paleness by reflectance photometry. Animal Science. 11(2). 243–246. 26 indexed citations
17.
Cuthbertson, A., et al.. (1968). The inter-relationships of various measurements, visual assessments and dissection results of pigs of 200 lb live weight. Animal Science. 10(3). 249–255. 15 indexed citations
18.
Bendall, J. R., et al.. (1966). A survey of pH1 and ultimate pH values of British progeny‐test pigs. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 1(3). 201–214. 16 indexed citations
19.
Leat, W. M. F., A. Cuthbertson, A.N. Howard, & G. A. Gresham. (1964). Studies on pigs reared on semi-synthetic diets containing no fat, beef tallow and maize oil: composition of carcass and fatty acid composition of various depot fats. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 63(3). 311–317. 39 indexed citations
20.
Cuthbertson, A. & R. W. Pomeroy. (1962). Quantitative anatomical studies of the composition of the pig at 50, 68 and 92 kg. carcass weight II. Gross composition and skeletal composition. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 59(2). 215–223. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026