J. P. Chadwick

710 total citations
27 papers, 571 citations indexed

About

J. P. Chadwick is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. P. Chadwick has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 571 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 14 papers in Small Animals and 12 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in J. P. Chadwick's work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (19 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (15 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (14 papers). J. P. Chadwick is often cited by papers focused on Meat and Animal Product Quality (19 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (15 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (14 papers). J. P. Chadwick collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. J. P. Chadwick's co-authors include M. Ellis, A. J. Kempster, Peter Rowlinson, J.H. Guy, M. J. Lehane, D. W. Jones, R. Laird, Paul J. Blanchard, C. C. Warkup and William C. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Meat Science, Applied Animal Behaviour Science and Journal of Economic Entomology.

In The Last Decade

J. P. Chadwick

27 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

J. P. Chadwick

ASZ

GENET

ECOLO

Jan-Paul Wagenaar Netherlands

L. Mounier France

A. Lourens Netherlands

Metin Petek Türkiye

T. Tennessen Canada

A. P. Sather Canada

D. Huonnic France

E.H. von Borell United States

L. A. Fitzpatrick Australia

Monique Bestman Netherlands

Jan-Paul Wagenaar Netherlands

J. P. Chadwick

508 ×1.3

ASZ

404 ×1.6

51 ×0.4

GENET

60 ×0.7

63 ×1.3

ECOLO

Citations per year, relative to J. P. Chadwick J. P. Chadwick (= 1×) peers Jan-Paul Wagenaar

Countries citing papers authored by J. P. Chadwick

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. P. Chadwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. P. Chadwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. P. Chadwick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. P. Chadwick

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. P. Chadwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. P. Chadwick. The network helps show where J. P. Chadwick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. P. Chadwick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. P. Chadwick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. P. Chadwick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. P. Chadwick. J. P. Chadwick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Chadwick, J. P., et al.. (2008). The Effect of Concentrate- and Silage-Based Finishing Diets on the Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Suffolk Cross and Scottish Blackface Lambs. TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCES. 32(3). 191–197. 9 indexed citations

Guy, J.H., Peter Rowlinson, J. P. Chadwick, & M. Ellis. (2002). Behaviour of two genotypes of growing–finishing pig in three different housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 75(3). 193–206. 81 indexed citations

Guy, J.H., Peter Rowlinson, J. P. Chadwick, & M. Ellis. (2002). Health conditions of two genotypes of growing-finishing pig in three different housing systems: implications for welfare. Livestock Production Science. 75(3). 233–243. 52 indexed citations

Blanchard, Paul J., et al.. (1999). The influence of rate of lean and fat tissue development on pork eating quality. Animal Science. 68(3). 477–485. 39 indexed citations

Blanchard, Paul J., M. Ellis, C. C. Warkup, J. P. Chadwick, & M. B. Willis. (1999). The influence of sex (boars and gilts) on growth, carcass and pork eating quality characteristics. Animal Science. 68(3). 487–493. 13 indexed citations

Guy, J.H., Peter Rowlinson, & J. P. Chadwick. (1995). A comparison of two genotypes of finishing pig housed in outdoor paddocks, straw yards and fully-slatted pens. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science. 1995. 34–34. 1 indexed citations

Blanchard, Paul J., et al.. (1995). The influence of rate of lean and fat tissue development on pork eating quality. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science. 1995. 11–11. 5 indexed citations

Chadwick, J. P., et al.. (1993). Comparison of Four Ultrasonic Techniques for In Vivo Estimation of Sheep Carcass Composition. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972). 1993. 28–28. 2 indexed citations

Cook, G. L., J. P. Chadwick, & A. J. Kempster. (1989). An assessment of carcass probes for use in Great Britain for the EC pig Carcass Grading Scheme. Animal Science. 48(2). 427–434. 16 indexed citations

10.

Ellis, M., J. P. Chadwick, William C. Smith, & R. Laird. (1988). Index selection for improved growth and carcass characteristics in a population of Large White pigs. Animal Science. 46(2). 265–275. 10 indexed citations

11.

Kempster, A. J., et al.. (1986). The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes. Meat Science. 16(2). 113–126. 9 indexed citations

12.

Chadwick, J. P., et al.. (1986). A Comparison of the Hennessy Lamb Probe, Ruler Probe and Visual Fat Scores for Use in Sheep Carcass Classification. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972). 1986. 39–39. 1 indexed citations

13.

Lehane, M. J., et al.. (1986). Improvements in the Pteridine Method for Determining Age in Adult Male and Female Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 79(6). 1714–1719. 41 indexed citations

14.

Kempster, A. J., et al.. (1986). Estimation of the carcass composition of different cattle breeds and crosses from fatness measurements and visual assessments. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 106(2). 223–237. 19 indexed citations

15.

Kempster, A. J., J. P. Chadwick, & D. W. Jones. (1985). An evaluation of the Hennessy Grading Probe and the SFK Fat-O-Meater for use in pig carcass classification and grading. Animal Science. 40(2). 323–329. 33 indexed citations

16.

Kempster, A. J., D. Gareth Evans, & J. P. Chadwick. (1984). The effects of source population, feeding regimen, sex and day of slaughter on the muscle quality characteristics of British crossbred pigs. Animal Science. 39(3). 455–464. 10 indexed citations

17.

Chadwick, J. P. & A. J. Kempster. (1983). A repeat national survey (ten years on) of muscle pH values in commercial bacon carcasses. Meat Science. 9(2). 101–111. 13 indexed citations

18.

Andersen, B. B., Hans Busk, J. P. Chadwick, et al.. (1983). Comparison of ultrasonic equipment for describing beef carcass characteristics in live cattle (Report on a joint ultrasonic trial carried out in the U.K. and Denmark). Livestock Production Science. 10(2). 133–147. 10 indexed citations

19.

Chadwick, J. P. & A. J. Kempster. (1983). The estimation of beef carcass composition from subcutaneous fat measurements taken on the intact side using different probing instruments. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 101(1). 241–248. 9 indexed citations

20.

Wood, J.D., M. Enser, H.J.H. MacFie, et al.. (1978). Fatty acid composition of backfat in large white pigs selected for low backfat thickness. Meat Science. 2(4). 289–300. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact