Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)
19932.6k citationsWilbert J. McKeachie et al.profile →
Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers
19941.1k citationsWilbert J. McKeachie et al.profile →
The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire
2005728 citationsWilbert J. McKeachie et al.Educational Psychologistprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Wilbert J. McKeachie
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Wilbert J. McKeachie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wilbert J. McKeachie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wilbert J. McKeachie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wilbert J. McKeachie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wilbert J. McKeachie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wilbert J. McKeachie. The network helps show where Wilbert J. McKeachie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wilbert J. McKeachie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wilbert J. McKeachie.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wilbert J. McKeachie based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wilbert J. McKeachie. Wilbert J. McKeachie is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McKeachie, Wilbert J.. (2014). Anxiety in the College Classroom. The Journal of Educational Research.6 indexed citations
McKeachie, Wilbert J., et al.. (1994). Learner Cognitive-Motivational Characteristics and Perceptions of Computer Conferencing Use. International journal of instructional media. 21(4).7 indexed citations
McKeachie, Wilbert J.. (1983). The Role of Faculty Evaluation in Enhancing College Teaching.. 63(2). 37–39.9 indexed citations
8.
McKeachie, Wilbert J.. (1982). Undergraduate Education in Psychology from the 1950's Through the 1990's.. Teaching of Psychology. 9(1). 62–63.1 indexed citations
9.
McKeachie, Wilbert J.. (1980). Learning, cognition, and college teaching. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government).34 indexed citations
McKeachie, Wilbert J. & Yun Lin. (1979). A Note on Validity of Student Ratings of Teaching.. Educational research quarterly. 4(3). 45–47.9 indexed citations
Walker, Edward L. & Wilbert J. McKeachie. (1967). Some thoughts about teaching the beginning course in psychology.9 indexed citations
18.
McKeachie, Wilbert J., et al.. (1966). Evaluating the introductory psychology course. Addison-Wesley eBooks.10 indexed citations
19.
McKeachie, Wilbert J. & Charlotte L. Doyle. (1966). Instructor's manual to accompany Psychology. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. eBooks.2 indexed citations
20.
McKeachie, Wilbert J.. (1960). The Instructor Faces Automation. Improving College and University Teaching. 8(3). 91–95.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.