Ursula Fuller

700 citations
17 papers · 429 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Online and Blended Learning 5
    • Higher Education Learning Practices 4
    • Educational Assessment and Pedagogy 3
    • Teaching and Learning Programming 5
    • Open Education and E-Learning 4

Ursula Fuller

17 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Ursula Fuller
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Computer Science Applications 290
  • Media Technology 106
  • Software 37
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 110
  • Information Systems 119
Replace Jana Jacková with:
Jana Jacková Slovakia
Lisa C. Kaczmarczyk United States
Jonas Boustedt Sweden
Tracy L. Lewis United States
Jeffrey J. McConnell United States
Grant Braught United States
Ville Isomöttönen Finland
Stuart Reges United States
Torsten Brinda Germany
Jaakko Kurhila Finland
Ursula Fuller relative to Jana Jacková Slovakia Jana Jacková's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jana Jacková · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ursula Fuller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ursula Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ursula Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ursula Fuller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ursula Fuller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ursula Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ursula Fuller. The network helps show where Ursula Fuller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Ursula Fuller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ursula Fuller Line = papers co-authored together Ursula Fuller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2007173
2 200666
3 200362
4 200732
5 199913
6 201013
7 200312
8 200612
9 199910
10 20059
11 20089
12
Should we assess our students' attitudes?
20077
13 20064
14 19983
15 19992
16 20081
17 19991

About Ursula Fuller

Ursula Fuller is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications, Communication, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Media Technology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (5 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (4 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (4 papers), Educational Assessment and Pedagogy (3 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (3 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (290 citations), Media Technology (106 citations), Software (37 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (110 citations) and Information Systems (119 citations). Ursula Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Colin G. Johnson, Charles Riedesel, Errol Thompson, Jana Jacková, Tuukka Ahoniemi, Diana Cukierman, Isidoro Hernán Losada, D. Thompson, Essi Lahtinen and Tracy L. Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) and ACM SIGCSE Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact