Tom Bielik

417 citations
25 papers · 248 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Bielik

23 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

Tom Bielik
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 86
  • Computer Science Applications 31
  • Education 138
  • Management Science and Operations Research 35
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 20
Replace Jim Vanides with:
Jim Vanides United States
İbrahim Delen Türkiye
Philipp Schmiemann Germany
Hayat Hokayem United States
Aaron Rogat United States
Horst Schecker Germany
Martin Schwichow Germany
Scott E. Grapin United States
Sara C. Heredia United States
Alison Haas United States
Tom Bielik relative to Jim Vanides United States Jim Vanides's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
Jim Vanides · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Bielik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Bielik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Bielik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Bielik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Bielik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Bielik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Bielik. The network helps show where Tom Bielik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Bielik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Bielik Line = papers co-authored together Tom Bielik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201934
2 201028
3 202327
4 201721
5 202315
6 202015
7 201615
8 201615
9 202214
10 20219
11 20188
12 20186
13 20186
14 20226
15 20205
16 20215
17 20185
18 20244
19 20233
20 20232

About Tom Bielik

Tom Bielik is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Science Applications, Molecular Biology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 25 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Pedagogy (14 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (3 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (86 citations), Computer Science Applications (31 citations), Education (138 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (35 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (20 citations). Tom Bielik has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Moritz Krell, Joseph Krajcik, Israel Touitou, Anat Yarden, İbrahim Delen, Marcelo Ehrlich, Nechama I. Smorodinsky, Galit Horn, Joseph Krajcik and David Chetrit. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Science Education and Technology, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Journal of Science Teacher Education, Journal of Biological Education and International Journal of STEM Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact