Thomas W. Harrell

30 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Thomas W. Harrell
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 67
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 86
  • General Psychology 10
  • Applied Psychology 32
  • Social Psychology 73
Replace Richard S. Barrett with:
Richard S. Barrett United States
Zandy B. Leibowitz United States
Alison L. O’Malley United States
Linda Mahar United States
William C. Byham United States
Rob Silzer United States
Darrell E. Roach United States
Thomas H. Patten United States
Joy Fisher Hazucha United States
Aaron W. Hughey United States
Thomas W. Harrell relative to Richard S. Barrett United States Richard S. Barrett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Richard S. Barrett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Harrell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Harrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Harrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Harrell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Harrell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Harrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Harrell. The network helps show where Thomas W. Harrell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Thomas W. Harrell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas W. Harrell Line = papers co-authored together Thomas W. Harrell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196945
2 196432
3
Manager's performance and personality
196124
4 198924
5 197018
6 197718
7 197316
8 197916
9 197215
10 197013
11 196412
12 199210
13 19529
14 19609
15 19718
16 19747
17 19515
18 19794
19 20083
20 19633

About Thomas W. Harrell

Thomas W. Harrell is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 33 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Marketing Education (9 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (3 papers), Leadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs (1 paper), Management Theory and Practice (1 paper), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (1 paper), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper), Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (67 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (86 citations), General Psychology (10 citations), Applied Psychology (32 citations) and Social Psychology (73 citations). Thomas W. Harrell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank J. Williams, Charles B. Weinberg, Shelby H. McIntyre, Edward Fry, William B. Kruyer, Donald B. Lindsley, Robert Schreiber, James R. Strader, Robert G. Smith and Raymond L. Price. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Personnel Psychology, Academy of Management Review, Human Performance and Academy of Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact