Thomas R. O’Neill
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Emergency Medical Services top 10%
- Education
- Co-authors
- Michael R. PeabodyJames C. PufferLars E. PetersonAndrew BazemoreElizabeth G. BaxleyBrenna E. BlackburnWarren P. NewtonMary E. Lunz
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (22 papers)Diversity and Career in Medicine (8 papers)Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (8 papers)
- Journals
- Academic MedicineThe Annals of Family MedicineThe Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFinland
In The Last Decade
Thomas R. O’Neill
42 papers receiving 326 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 169
- General Health Professions 158
- Gender Studies 62
- Emergency Medical Services 52
- Education 45
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas R. O’Neill
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas R. O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas R. O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas R. O’Neill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas R. O’Neill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas R. O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas R. O’Neill. The network helps show where Thomas R. O’Neill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas R. O’Neill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas R. O’Neill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas R. O’Neill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas R. O’Neill. Thomas R. O’Neill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 54 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Differences in Canadian and US Medical Student Preparation for Family Medicine. | 4 |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Thomas R. O’Neill
Thomas R. O’Neill is a scholar working on Family Practice, Research and Theory and Health Information Management, having authored 45 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (22 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (8 papers) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (34 citations), Emergency Medical Services (52 citations) and Gender Studies (62 citations). Thomas R. O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. Peabody, James C. Puffer, Lars E. Peterson, Andrew Bazemore, Elizabeth G. Baxley, Brenna E. Blackburn, Warren P. Newton, Mary E. Lunz, Kenneth D. Royal and Hao Song. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, The Annals of Family Medicine and The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.