The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

55.7k citations

2.7k papers · indexed · active since 1950

General Health Professions top 2%
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
Epidemiology top 10%
Economics and Econometrics top 5%
Clinical Psychology top 5%

Fields: General Health Professions (1.1k papers)Health Information Management (102 papers)Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (626 papers)
Topics: Primary Care and Health OutcomesHealthcare Policy and ManagementChronic Disease Management Strategies
Top scholars: Thomas C. Rosenthal Dwenda K. Gjerdingen Mark H. Ebell Andrew Bazemore Paul Crawford Dana E. King Sarina Schrager Marjorie A. Bowman

In The Last Decade

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

2.5k papers receiving 52.0k citations

Peers

General Health Professions 18.8k
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 11.9k
Epidemiology 8.2k
Economics and Econometrics 5.9k
Clinical Psychology 4.9k

Replace Health Expectations with:

Health Expectations United Kingdom

British Journal of General Practice United Kingdom

Health Technology Assessment United Kingdom

Medical Decision Making United States

Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Sweden

BMC Family Practice United Kingdom

The Annals of Family Medicine United States

Sociology of Health & Illness United Kingdom

Systematic Reviews United Kingdom

Telemedicine Journal and e-Health United States

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine relative to Health Expectations United Kingdom Health Expectations's profile →

Citations per field

00.5×1.6×

Health Expectations · 1×

×0.5 19k/36k

GHP

×0.9 12k/13k

PHEOH

×1.6 8k/5k

EPIDE

×0.9 6k/7k

EE

×0.7 5k/7k

CP

Citations per year

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

About The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

The 2.7k papers published in The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 55.7k indexed citations . Papers published in The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine usually cover General Health Professions (1.1k papers), Health Information Management (102 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (626 papers) specifically the topics of Primary Care and Health Outcomes (571 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (320 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (147 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine are Thomas C. Rosenthal, Dwenda K. Gjerdingen, Mark H. Ebell, Andrew Bazemore, Paul Crawford, Dana E. King, Sarina Schrager, Marjorie A. Bowman, J. W. Mold and Klea D. Bertakis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact