Thomas P. Ference
Impact in
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Human Resource and Talent Management
- Management and Organizational Studies
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Human Resource and Talent Management 2
- Management Theory and Practice 1
-
- Game Theory and Voting Systems 1
- Co-authors
- James A. F. Stoner (2 shared papers)Fred H. Goldner (4 shared papers)R. Richard Ritti (4 shared papers)Abraham K. Korman (1 shared paper)Donald B. Giddon (1 shared paper)Samuel F. Dworkin (1 shared paper)Raymond E. Miles (1 shared paper)Lyman W. Porter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Academy of Management Review (2 papers)Management Science (1 paper)American Behavioral Scientist (1 paper)Journal of Management (1 paper)The Sociological Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas P. Ference
12 papers receiving 360 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 245
- Gender Studies 64
- Leadership and Management 7
- Social Psychology 108
- Public Administration 17
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas P. Ference
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas P. Ference's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas P. Ference with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas P. Ference more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas P. Ference
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas P. Ference. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas P. Ference. The network helps show where Thomas P. Ference may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Thomas P. Ference, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 216 | |
| 2 | 1977 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1981 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1970 | 37 | |
| 6 | Behavioral science and dental practice | 1978 | 8 |
| 7 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1974 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1972 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1970 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1971 | 2 |
About Thomas P. Ference
Thomas P. Ference is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Economics and Econometrics, Education, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 12 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human Resource and Talent Management (2 papers), Higher Education and Employability (2 papers), Management Theory and Practice (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper), Cognitive Science and Mapping (1 paper), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (1 paper), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (245 citations), Gender Studies (64 citations), Leadership and Management (7 citations), Social Psychology (108 citations) and Public Administration (17 citations). Thomas P. Ference has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James A. F. Stoner, Fred H. Goldner, R. Richard Ritti, Abraham K. Korman, Donald B. Giddon, Samuel F. Dworkin, Raymond E. Miles, Lyman W. Porter and William M. Fox. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Management Science, American Behavioral Scientist, Journal of Management and The Sociological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.