American Behavioral Scientist

4.6k papers and 115.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.6k papers published in American Behavioral Scientist in the last decades have received a total of 115.0k indexed citations. Papers published in American Behavioral Scientist usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.9k papers), Political Science and International Relations (653 papers) and Communication (605 papers) specifically the topics of Social Media and Politics (443 papers), Media Studies and Communication (259 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (183 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Behavioral Scientist are Susan Leigh Star, Nathaniel H. Leff, Gregory M. Herek, Morton Deutsch, Kimberly Young, Norman Garmezy, Dorceta E. Taylor, Neil Fligstein, Barry Wellman and Riley E. Dunlap.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in American Behavioral Scientist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American Behavioral Scientist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Behavioral Scientist.

Countries where authors publish in American Behavioral Scientist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Behavioral Scientist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Behavioral Scientist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Behavioral Scientist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025