Susannah Howe

626 total citations
44 papers, 327 citations indexed

About

Susannah Howe is a scholar working on Media Technology, Architecture and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Susannah Howe has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 327 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Media Technology, 26 papers in Architecture and 14 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Susannah Howe's work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (28 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (26 papers) and Design Education and Practice (10 papers). Susannah Howe is often cited by papers focused on Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (28 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (26 papers) and Design Education and Practice (10 papers). Susannah Howe collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belarus. Susannah Howe's co-authors include Marie Paretti, Daria Kotys-Schwartz, Denny Davis, Jay McCormack, Steven Beyerlein, Phillip Thompson, Michael S. Trevisan, Howard Davis, Julie Dyke Ford and Donna Riley and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, International journal of engineering education and AEE Journal.

In The Last Decade

Susannah Howe

38 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Susannah Howe United States 11 238 117 110 105 70 44 327
Sandra Courter United States 7 175 0.7× 80 0.7× 38 0.3× 107 1.0× 40 0.6× 31 256
Penny Hirsch United States 9 201 0.8× 70 0.6× 68 0.6× 141 1.3× 67 1.0× 26 326
Eli Fromm United States 8 244 1.0× 147 1.3× 59 0.5× 97 0.9× 90 1.3× 26 420
Julie Dyke Ford United States 10 170 0.7× 52 0.4× 29 0.3× 118 1.1× 26 0.4× 28 301
Nicholas Fila United States 10 128 0.5× 41 0.4× 109 1.0× 152 1.4× 117 1.7× 53 388
C.F. Yokomoto United States 8 220 0.9× 109 0.9× 60 0.5× 120 1.1× 67 1.0× 42 372
Daniel Ferguson United States 10 120 0.5× 38 0.3× 51 0.5× 88 0.8× 72 1.0× 54 276
Jenny Daugherty United States 11 94 0.4× 59 0.5× 54 0.5× 228 2.2× 27 0.4× 36 366
Stephanie Cutler United States 10 228 1.0× 40 0.3× 36 0.3× 310 3.0× 81 1.2× 54 500
Llewellyn Mann Australia 8 124 0.5× 23 0.2× 129 1.2× 161 1.5× 67 1.0× 36 359

Countries citing papers authored by Susannah Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susannah Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susannah Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susannah Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susannah Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susannah Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susannah Howe. The network helps show where Susannah Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susannah Howe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susannah Howe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susannah Howe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susannah Howe. Susannah Howe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Paretti, Marie, et al.. (2022). Preparing for Engineering Work: Interpersonal Relationships in the School to Work Transition. 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 1–6. 1 indexed citations
2.
Paretti, Marie, et al.. (2021). Research Methods for the Capstone to Work (C2W) Project. VTechWorks (Virginia Tech). 5 indexed citations
3.
Paretti, Marie, et al.. (2020). Leveraging the capstone design experience to build self-directed learning. International journal of engineering education. 36(2). 664–674. 4 indexed citations
4.
Trevisan, Michael S., Denny Davis, Steven Beyerlein, et al.. (2020). Integrated Design Engineering Assessment and Learning System (IDEALS):. 25.789.1–25.789.18.
5.
Howe, Susannah, et al.. (2019). Client interaction tools: supporting student professionalism on client-based capstone design projects. International journal of engineering education. 35(6). 1953–1968. 2 indexed citations
6.
Paretti, Marie, et al.. (2019). Transitioning from capstone design courses to workplaces: a study of new engineers’ first three months. International journal of engineering education. 35(6). 1993–2013. 19 indexed citations
7.
Howe, Susannah. (2018). Cultivating the Capstone Ecosystem to Educate the Engineer of 2020. International journal of engineering education. 34(2). 653–658. 3 indexed citations
8.
Howe, Susannah, et al.. (2017). The 2015 Capstone Design Survey Results: Current Practices and Changes over Time. International journal of engineering education. 33(5). 1393–1421. 22 indexed citations
9.
Goldberg, Jay R. & Susannah Howe. (2015). Virtual Capstone Design Teams: Preparing for Global Innovation. International journal of engineering education. 31(6). 1773–1779. 1 indexed citations
10.
Goldberg, Jay R. & Susannah Howe. (2015). Virtual Capstone Design Teams: Preparing for Global Innovation (Journal article). International journal of engineering education. 1 indexed citations
11.
Trevisan, Michael S., Jay McCormack, Steven Beyerlein, et al.. (2014). Alumni perspective on professional skills gained through integrated assessment and learning. International journal of engineering education. 30(1). 48–59. 5 indexed citations
12.
Howe, Susannah, et al.. (2014). Student reflections on capstone design: experiences with industry-sponsored projects. International journal of engineering education. 30(1). 39–47. 3 indexed citations
13.
McCormack, Jay, Steven Beyerlein, Denny Davis, et al.. (2012). Contextualizing Professionalism in Capstone Projects Using the IDEALS Professional Responsibility Assessment. International journal of engineering education. 28(2). 416–424. 2 indexed citations
14.
Howe, Susannah, Kevin Caves, Carsten Kleiner, et al.. (2011). Nifty Ideas and Surprising Flops in Capstone Design Education. International journal of engineering education. 27(6). 1174–1185. 3 indexed citations
15.
McCormack, Jay, Steven Beyerlein, Denny Davis, et al.. (2010). Assessing professional skill development in capstone design courses. International journal of engineering education. 27(6). 1308–1323. 19 indexed citations
16.
Davis, Denny, Michael S. Trevisan, Howard Davis, et al.. (2010). Assessing team member citizenship in capstone engineering design courses. International journal of engineering education. 26(4). 771–783. 20 indexed citations
17.
Howe, Susannah. (2010). Where Are We Now? Statistics on Capstone Courses Nationwide.. AEE Journal. 2(1). 52 indexed citations
18.
Riley, Donna, et al.. (2009). Design for Economic Empowerment: Student engagement and learning across cultures and disciplines. 4(2). 147–172. 1 indexed citations
19.
Kussmaul, Clif, Susannah Howe, & Simon Priest. (2006). Using wikis to foster team communication, cohesion, & collaboration. Journal of computing sciences in colleges. 21(6). 66–68. 4 indexed citations
20.
Howe, Susannah, et al.. (2006). Current Practices in Engineering Capstone Education: Further Results from a 2005 Nationwide Survey. Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College). 5–10. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026