Steven A. Taylor
About
In The Last Decade
Steven A. Taylor
62 papers receiving 14.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 13.0k
- Marketing 8.8k
- Sociology and Political Science 5.0k
- Information Systems and Management 4.0k
- Strategy and Management 2.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Steven A. Taylor
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven A. Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven A. Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven A. Taylor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven A. Taylor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven A. Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven A. Taylor. The network helps show where Steven A. Taylor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven A. Taylor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven A. Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven A. Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven A. Taylor. Steven A. Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | Transformative Service Practice in Higher Education: A Cautionary Note | 2 |
| 3 | Attitude and Gender as Predictors of Insurance Loyalty | 2 |
| 4 | Value, Satisfaction, and Loyalty: An Evolving Conceptualization | 1 |
| 5 | 77 | |
| 6 | The Relationship between Eudaimonic Well-Being and Social Well-Being with Millennials | 5 |
| 7 | Retailer Brand Experience, Brand Experience Congruence, and Consumer Satisfaction | 37 |
| 8 | Satisfaction, Regret, and Status Quo Effects on the Formation of Consumer Loyalty | 5 |
| 9 | Reconciling Satisfaction, Emotions, Attitudes, and Ambivalence within Consumer Models of Judgment and Decision Making: A Cautionary Tale | 15 |
| 10 | Distinguishing the Factors Influencing College Students' Choice of Major. | 140 |
| 11 | 65 | |
| 12 | TESTING AN EXPANDED ATTITUDE MODEL OF GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOUR IN A LOYALTY CONTEXT | 28 |
| 13 | An Exploratory Investigation into the Antecedents of Satisfaction, Brand Attitude, and Loyalty within the (B2B) eCRM Industry | 81 |
| 14 | Technology Readiness in the E-Insurance Industry: An Exploratory Investigation and Development of an Agent Technology E-Consumption Model | 52 |
| 15 | Assessing the Use of Regression Analysis in Examining Service Recovery in the Insurance Industry: Relating Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, and Customer Trust | 41 |
| 16 | Involvement with Services: An Empirical Replication and Extension of Zaichkowsky's Personal Involvement Inventory | 22 |
| 17 | 181 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | Servperf versus Servqual: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality breakdown → | 2110 |
| 20 | Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension breakdown → | 6502 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.