Stefan Decuyper

657 citations
5 papers · 419 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Stefan Decuyper

5 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers

Stefan Decuyper
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Communication 112
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 95
  • Social Psychology 163
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 17
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 86
Replace Mercè Mach with:
Mercè Mach Spain
Nicola Kemp United Kingdom
Geraldine Lefoe Australia
Anna Kayes United States
David M. Rosch United States
Janine Waclawski United States
Earl Nason United States
Thomas M. Schwen United States
Norah Jones United Kingdom
Marijke Kehrhahn United States
Stefan Decuyper relative to Mercè Mach Spain Mercè Mach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Mercè Mach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stefan Decuyper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stefan Decuyper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefan Decuyper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefan Decuyper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stefan Decuyper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefan Decuyper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefan Decuyper. The network helps show where Stefan Decuyper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Stefan Decuyper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stefan Decuyper Line = papers co-authored together Stefan Decuyper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 2010300
2 201552
3 201247
4 201219
5
Modelling and Facilitating Team Learning
20101

About Stefan Decuyper

Stefan Decuyper is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management, Communication and General Health Professions, having authored 5 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Construction Project Management and Performance (1 paper), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (1 paper) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (112 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (95 citations), Social Psychology (163 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (17 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (86 citations). Stefan Decuyper has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Filip Dochy, Piet Van den Bossche, Elisabeth Raes, Eva Kyndt and Johan Put. Their work appears in journals such as Instructional Science, Educational Research Review, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Children and Youth Services Review and Lirias (KU Leuven).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact