Sheryl Grant

522 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 322 citations indexed

About

Sheryl Grant is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Sheryl Grant has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 322 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Education, 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Sheryl Grant's work include Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (2 papers). Sheryl Grant is often cited by papers focused on Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (2 papers). Sheryl Grant collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Sheryl Grant's co-authors include David Gibson, Nathaniel Ostashewski, Kim Flintoff, Terrell Russell, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Rupert Ward and Glenn Hardaker and has published in prestigious journals such as Education and Information Technologies, IEEE Transactions on Education and Journal of Education for Library and Information Science.

In The Last Decade

Sheryl Grant

7 papers receiving 288 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Digital badges in education

2013 262 citations David Gibson, Nathaniel Ostashewski et al. Education and Information Technologies profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sheryl Grant United States	5	164	149	116	52	49	7	322
Kim Flintoff Australia	5	166 1.0×	172 1.2×	114 1.0×	109 2.1×	68 1.4×	8	370
Terumi Miyazoe Japan	7	158 1.0×	252 1.7×	100 0.9×	65 1.3×	42 0.9×	15	414
Stefano Cacciamani Italy	10	151 0.9×	196 1.3×	61 0.5×	55 1.1×	34 0.7×	38	319
Rebecca Yvonne Bayeck United States	8	91 0.6×	102 0.7×	106 0.9×	37 0.7×	72 1.5×	23	279
Evren Eryilmaz United States	10	159 1.0×	258 1.7×	124 1.1×	88 1.7×	64 1.3×	29	432
David Annand Canada	8	131 0.8×	233 1.6×	135 1.2×	52 1.0×	43 0.9×	15	333
Evelyn McLellan United Kingdom	5	109 0.7×	236 1.6×	92 0.8×	36 0.7×	28 0.6×	8	321
Karl Steffens Germany	11	171 1.0×	226 1.5×	217 1.9×	128 2.5×	29 0.6×	30	438
G. Conole United Kingdom	7	117 0.7×	223 1.5×	109 0.9×	66 1.3×	48 1.0×	17	362
Luca Morini United Kingdom	8	135 0.8×	112 0.8×	73 0.6×	55 1.1×	30 0.6×	25	276

Countries citing papers authored by Sheryl Grant

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sheryl Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheryl Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheryl Grant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sheryl Grant

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheryl Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheryl Grant. The network helps show where Sheryl Grant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sheryl Grant

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sheryl Grant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sheryl Grant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sheryl Grant. Sheryl Grant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Ward, Rupert, et al.. (2024). The Universal Micro-Credential Framework: The Role of Badges, Micro-Credentials, Skills Profiling, and Design Patterns in Developing Interdisciplinary Learning and Assessment Paths for Computing Education. IEEE Transactions on Education. 67(6). 897–906. 3 indexed citations

2.

Grant, Sheryl, et al.. (2023). Signals and noise: communicating achievement through alternative credentials. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. 40(4). 305–316. 4 indexed citations

3.

Grant, Sheryl. (2019). An Exploratory Study of Values Alignments in a Teacher Professional Development Digital Badge System. Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). 1 indexed citations

4.

Grant, Sheryl. (2016). History and Context of Open Digital Badges. 17–25. 15 indexed citations

5.

Grant, Sheryl. (2014). Badges: Show What You Know. 12(2). 28. 12 indexed citations

6.

Gibson, David, et al.. (2013). Digital badges in education. Education and Information Technologies. 20(2). 403–410. 262 indexed citations breakdown →

7.

Sugimoto, Cassidy R., Terrell Russell, & Sheryl Grant. (2009). Library and Information Science Doctoral Education: The Landscape from 1930-2007. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 50(3). 190–202. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact