Annals of Pharmacotherapy

7.5k papers and 155.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.5k papers published in Annals of Pharmacotherapy in the last decades have received a total of 155.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Pharmacotherapy usually cover Pharmacology (1.2k papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.1k papers) and Surgery (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (771 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (430 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (424 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Pharmacotherapy are Thomas R. Einarson, Robert J. Cersosimo, Milap C. Nahata, Joseph F. Dasta, Karen B. Farris, William E. Dager, Robert P. Rapp, Brian L. Erstad, R. Keith Campbell and Darren M. Ashcroft.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Pharmacotherapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Pharmacotherapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Pharmacotherapy.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Pharmacotherapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Pharmacotherapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Pharmacotherapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Pharmacotherapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025