Amy H. Schwartz

793 citations
17 papers · 592 indexed · h-index 8

Amy H. Schwartz

15 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers

Amy H. Schwartz
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 321
  • Family Practice 77
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 39
  • Emergency Medical Services 51
  • General Health Professions 147
Replace Andrew Gilbert with:
Andrew Gilbert Australia
William A. Zellmer United States
Derek Jorgenson Canada
Lotte Stig Nørgaard Denmark
Alessandra Rezende Mesquita Brazil
Lezley‐Anne Hanna United Kingdom
Hazel Sinclair United Kingdom
Lourdes G. Planas United States
Geoffrey Harding United Kingdom
Paul L. Ranelli United States
Amy H. Schwartz relative to Andrew Gilbert Australia Andrew Gilbert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Andrew Gilbert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy H. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy H. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy H. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy H. Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy H. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy H. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy H. Schwartz. The network helps show where Amy H. Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy H. Schwartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy H. Schwartz Line = papers co-authored together Amy H. Schwartz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 20235
2 20220
3 2015138
4 201483
5
A curriculum committee toolkit for addressing the 2013 CAPE outcomes
20142
6 20134
7 20068
8 20060
9 20063
10 20066
11 20042
12 200438
13 2003182
14 20031
15 200319
16 200230
17 199271

About Amy H. Schwartz

Amy H. Schwartz is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers), Pharmacy and Medical Practices (2 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper) and Online Learning and Analytics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (321 citations), Family Practice (77 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (39 citations). Amy H. Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Andersen, Tami L. Remington, Raylene M. Rospond, Susan K. Chuck, C. Edwin Webb, Melissa Blair, Elizabeth A. Chester, Dave L. Dixon, Tracie Rothrock‐Christian and Sarah McBane. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, Social Cognition and The AMA Journal of Ethic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026