Amy H. Schwartz
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Family Practice top 5%
- Co-authors
- Susan M. AndersenTami L. RemingtonRaylene M. RospondSusan K. ChuckC. Edwin WebbMelissa BlairElizabeth A. ChesterDave L. Dixon
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (9 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers)Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers)
- Journals
- Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapySocial CognitionAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Amy H. Schwartz
15 papers receiving 542 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 321
- General Health Professions 147
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 141
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 89
- Family Practice 77
Countries citing papers authored by Amy H. Schwartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy H. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy H. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy H. Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy H. Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy H. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy H. Schwartz. The network helps show where Amy H. Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy H. Schwartz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy H. Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy H. Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy H. Schwartz. Amy H. Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 138 | |
| 4 | 83 | |
| 5 | A curriculum committee toolkit for addressing the 2013 CAPE outcomes | 2 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 182 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 71 |
About Amy H. Schwartz
Amy H. Schwartz is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (321 citations), Family Practice (77 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (39 citations). Amy H. Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Andersen, Tami L. Remington, Raylene M. Rospond, Susan K. Chuck, C. Edwin Webb, Melissa Blair, Elizabeth A. Chester, Dave L. Dixon, Tracie Rothrock‐Christian and Sarah McBane. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, Social Cognition and American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.