Ruth E. Nemire

25 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Ruth E. Nemire
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 126
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 161
  • General Health Professions 123
  • Research and Theory 4
  • Education 107
Replace Daniel R. Malcom with:
Daniel R. Malcom United States
Cynthia J. Boyle United States
Scott K. Stolte United States
Mitra Assemi United States
Andrew P. Traynor United States
Louis Roller Australia
Jennifer Danielson United States
Alex N. Isaacs United States
Déborah Pimentel Brazil
Erica Sainsbury Australia
Ruth E. Nemire relative to Daniel R. Malcom United States Daniel R. Malcom's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×
Daniel R. Malcom · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Nemire

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Nemire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Nemire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Nemire more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Nemire

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Nemire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Nemire. The network helps show where Ruth E. Nemire may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. Nemire, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth E. Nemire Line = papers co-authored together Ruth E. Nemire links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201484
2 200948
3 200846
4 201141
5 200632
6 200632
7 201726
8 200722
9 200821
10 202121
11 200515
12 201712
13 199412
14 200411
15 20109
16 20109
17 20157
18 20087
19 20077
20 20137

About Ruth E. Nemire

Ruth E. Nemire is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Education and Family Practice, having authored 27 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (10 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (9 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (2 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (126 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (161 citations), General Health Professions (123 citations), Research and Theory (4 citations) and Education (107 citations). Ruth E. Nemire has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Meyer, Jeannine M. Conway, Jeff Cain, Scott K. Stolte, Margarita V. DiVall, Brian L. Erstad, Amy H. Schwartz, Paul R. Lockman, William Lang and Mitra Assemi. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy and Journal of the American Pharmacists Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact