Scott H. Oppler
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Elaine D. PulakosLeonard A. WhiteWalter C. BormanMary Ann HansonChristopher T. SmithCharlotte A. BoettigerJohn P. CampbellDana Dunleavy
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers)Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPhysical review. B, Condensed matter
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Scott H. Oppler
26 papers receiving 686 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 285
- Social Psychology 190
- Gender Studies 174
- Sociology and Political Science 163
- Education 97
Countries citing papers authored by Scott H. Oppler
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott H. Oppler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott H. Oppler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott H. Oppler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott H. Oppler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott H. Oppler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott H. Oppler. The network helps show where Scott H. Oppler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott H. Oppler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott H. Oppler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott H. Oppler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott H. Oppler. Scott H. Oppler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 71 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | The College Board SAT® Writing Validation Study: An Assessment of Predictive and Incremental Validity. Research Report No. 2006-2. | 9 |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | Practical Implications of Test Dimensionality for Item Response Theory Calibration of the Medical College Admission Test. MCAT Monograph. | 2 |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 134 |
About Scott H. Oppler
Scott H. Oppler is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (285 citations), Gender Studies (174 citations) and Applied Psychology (89 citations). Scott H. Oppler has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Elaine D. Pulakos, Leonard A. White, Walter C. Borman, Mary Ann Hanson, Christopher T. Smith, Charlotte A. Boettiger, John P. Campbell, Dana Dunleavy, Ruth A. Childs and Xiaohui Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.