Ruth Nathan

721 citations
18 papers · 516 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth Nathan

12 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Ruth Nathan
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 443
  • Statistics and Probability 168
  • Education 240
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 114
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 6
Replace Victor Van Daal with:
Victor Van Daal Netherlands
Michal Shany Israel
Shirley V. Dickson United States
Cheryl M. Yates United States
Denyse V. Hayward Canada
Danielle Lopez United States
Leilani Sáez United States
Edward R. Sipay
John Redgwick Crossland United Kingdom
Marilyn M. Fairbanks United States
Ruth Nathan relative to Victor Van Daal Netherlands Victor Van Daal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Victor Van Daal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Nathan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Nathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Nathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Nathan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Nathan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Nathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Nathan. The network helps show where Ruth Nathan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Nathan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Nathan Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Nathan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1988114
2 1991107
3 198687
4
The beginnings of writing
198286
5 198547
6 198535
7 199622
8 19834
9
Writers Express: A Handbook for Young Writers, Thinkers, and Learners
19944
10
Classroom Strategies That Work: An Elementary Teacher's Guide to Process Writing
19884
11 19953
12 19981
13 19881
14 20011
15
Talking about Books: Outstanding Nonfiction Choices for 1996.
19970
16 19970
17 19900
18 19860

About Ruth Nathan

Ruth Nathan is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability, Literature and Literary Theory and Language and Linguistics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper) and Writing and Handwriting Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (443 citations), Statistics and Probability (168 citations), Education (240 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (114 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations). Ruth Nathan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Keith E. Stanovich, Charles Temple, Richard F. West, Ruth L. Gottesman and Randy Elliot Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Theory Into Practice, Journal of Learning Disabilities, The Elementary School Journal and Reading Research Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact