Schwanda K. Flowers

403 total citations
18 papers, 305 citations indexed

About

Schwanda K. Flowers is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Geriatrics and Gerontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Schwanda K. Flowers has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 305 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology. Recurrent topics in Schwanda K. Flowers's work include Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (7 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (7 papers). Schwanda K. Flowers is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (7 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (7 papers). Schwanda K. Flowers collaborates with scholars based in United States. Schwanda K. Flowers's co-authors include Cindy D. Stowe, Paul O. Gubbins, Nalin Payakachat, Catherine E. O’Brien, Seth Heldenbrand, William Lang, Jeffrey Bratberg, Ruth E. Nemire, Bradley C. Martin and Donna West and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association and Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning.

In The Last Decade

Schwanda K. Flowers

18 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Schwanda K. Flowers United States 11 155 103 78 70 27 18 305
Mitra Assemi United States 11 254 1.6× 213 2.1× 127 1.6× 76 1.1× 25 0.9× 27 455
Özlem Sarıkaya Türkiye 9 159 1.0× 81 0.8× 20 0.3× 40 0.6× 10 0.4× 27 346
Anita Raymond Australia 10 80 0.5× 72 0.7× 21 0.3× 40 0.6× 14 0.5× 14 272
Deborah A. Sturpe United States 10 187 1.2× 85 0.8× 69 0.9× 85 1.2× 3 0.1× 21 338
David R. Steeb United States 9 174 1.1× 85 0.8× 65 0.8× 42 0.6× 3 0.1× 28 276
Suzanne M. Galal United States 9 118 0.8× 86 0.8× 72 0.9× 84 1.2× 2 0.1× 33 298
Robyn Latessa United States 10 193 1.2× 132 1.3× 10 0.1× 93 1.3× 24 0.9× 22 348
Leticia Ibarra United States 11 160 1.0× 135 1.3× 9 0.1× 26 0.4× 13 0.5× 16 319
Jeffrey N. Baldwin United States 11 161 1.0× 162 1.6× 131 1.7× 40 0.6× 13 0.5× 30 382
Bridget Maher Ireland 8 175 1.1× 116 1.1× 5 0.1× 36 0.5× 39 1.4× 13 287

Countries citing papers authored by Schwanda K. Flowers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Schwanda K. Flowers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Schwanda K. Flowers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Schwanda K. Flowers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Schwanda K. Flowers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Schwanda K. Flowers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Schwanda K. Flowers. The network helps show where Schwanda K. Flowers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Schwanda K. Flowers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Schwanda K. Flowers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Schwanda K. Flowers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Schwanda K. Flowers. Schwanda K. Flowers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Curran, Geoffrey M., et al.. (2019). Pharmacy Students’ Lived Experiences of Academic Difficulty and Tinto’s Theory of Student Departure. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 83(10). 7447–7447. 10 indexed citations
2.
Flowers, Schwanda K., et al.. (2018). Becoming more holistic: A literature review of nonacademic factors in the admissions process of colleges and schools of pharmacy and other health professions. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 10(10). 1429–1437. 9 indexed citations
3.
Heldenbrand, Seth, Lindsey Dayer, Bradley C. Martin, et al.. (2017). APPE Evaluations are Positively Associated with MMI, Pre-pharmacy GPA and Pharmacy GPA. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 82(7). 6326–6326. 15 indexed citations
4.
Dayer, Lindsey, et al.. (2016). Pharmacists' perceived knowledge of and confidence in dispensing oral antineoplastic agents. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 56(2). 141–144.e2. 10 indexed citations
5.
Heldenbrand, Seth, Schwanda K. Flowers, Paul O. Gubbins, et al.. (2016). Multiple Mini-Interview Performance Predicts Academic Difficulty in the PharmD Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 80(2). 27–27. 24 indexed citations
6.
O’Brien, Catherine E., Schwanda K. Flowers, & Cindy D. Stowe. (2015). Desirable Skills in New Pharmacists. Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 30(1). 94–98. 10 indexed citations
7.
Payakachat, Nalin, et al.. (2014). Factors Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life of Student Pharmacists. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 78(1). 7–7. 29 indexed citations
8.
Stowe, Cindy D., Ashley N. Castleberry, Catherine E. O’Brien, et al.. (2014). Development and implementation of the multiple mini-interview in pharmacy admissions. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 6(6). 849–855. 9 indexed citations
9.
Payakachat, Nalin, et al.. (2013). Academic Help-Seeking Behavior Among Student Pharmacists. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 77(1). 7–7. 37 indexed citations
10.
Chisholm‐Burns, Marie A., Christina A. Spivey, Dean Billheimer, et al.. (2012). Multi-Institutional Study of Women and Underrepresented Minority Faculty Members in Academic Pharmacy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 76(1). 7–7. 24 indexed citations
11.
Bratberg, Jeffrey, et al.. (2011). Report of the 2010-2011 Standing Committee on Advocacy: Leveraging Faculty Engagement to Improve Public Policy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 75(10). S7–S7. 41 indexed citations
12.
Flowers, Schwanda K., et al.. (2011). Students' perception of professional advocacy following a political advocacy course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 4(1). 34–38. 9 indexed citations
13.
Flowers, Schwanda K., et al.. (2010). Web-based Multimedia Vignettes in Advanced Community Pharmacy Practice Experiences. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 74(3). 39–39. 20 indexed citations
14.
Flowers, Schwanda K., et al.. (2010). Arkansas Community Pharmacists’ Opinions on Providing Immunizations. Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 23(5). 496–501. 22 indexed citations
15.
Flowers, Schwanda K., et al.. (2010). An Objective Standardized Clinical Examination (OSCE) in an Advanced Nonprescription Medicines Course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 74(6). 98–98. 18 indexed citations
16.
Eiland, Lea S., et al.. (2010). A comparative study of student and faculty perspectives regarding career opportunities in pharmacy academia. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2(1). 39–51. 12 indexed citations
17.
Flowers, Schwanda K., et al.. (2010). Expanding Experiential Opportunities Through Patient Care Services. Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 23(6). 575–578. 2 indexed citations
18.
Flowers, Schwanda K., et al.. (2006). Integrating an Elective Self-Care Experience With a Required Advanced Pharmacy Practice Community Experience. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 70(6). 144–144. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026