Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?
2009540 citationsChris Jones, Ruslan Ramanau et al.Computers & Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ruslan Ramanau
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruslan Ramanau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruslan Ramanau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruslan Ramanau more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruslan Ramanau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruslan Ramanau. The network helps show where Ruslan Ramanau may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruslan Ramanau
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruslan Ramanau.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruslan Ramanau based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ruslan Ramanau. Ruslan Ramanau is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ramanau, Ruslan. (2016). Internationalization at a Distance. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. 40(5). 545–575.24 indexed citations
4.
Ramanau, Ruslan, et al.. (2011). International management learning: comparative study of the Open University students. Open Research Online (The Open University).1 indexed citations
5.
Ramanau, Ruslan, Anesa Hosein, & Chris Jones. (2010). Symposium 3: Learning and Living Technologies. Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning. 7. 627–634.3 indexed citations
6.
Hosein, Anesa, et al.. (2010). Are all net generation students the same? The frequency of technology use at university. Open Research Online (The Open University).4 indexed citations
Ramanau, Ruslan, Anesa Hosein, & Chris Jones. (2010). Learning and living technologies: a longitudinal study of first-year students' expectations and experiences in the use of ICT. Open Research Online (The Open University).14 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Chris, et al.. (2009). Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?. Computers & Education. 54(3). 722–732.540 indexed citations breakdown →
Benfield, Greg, Ruslan Ramanau, & Rhona Sharpe. (2009). Student learning technology use: preferences for study and contact. Open Research Online (The Open University).4 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Chris & Ruslan Ramanau. (2009). The Net Generation enters university: What are the implications for Technology Enhanced Learning?. Open Research Online (The Open University).9 indexed citations
Ramanau, Ruslan. (2005). Qualitative and Quantitative Aspects of Dialogue on a Distance Course. 2005(1). 2944–2949.
16.
Ramanau, Ruslan. (2004). The Impact of Web-Based Instruction on Transactional Distance. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2004(1). 3707–3710.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.