Replace Journal of Research on Technology in Education with:
Journal of Research on Technology in EducationUnited States
On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning FuturesUnited States
Educational Media InternationalUnited States
Distance EducationUnited States
Technology Pedagogy and EducationUnited Kingdom
American Journal of Distance EducationUnited States
Journal of Computing in Higher EducationUnited States
Computers & compositionUnited States
Online LearningUnited States
Journal of Information Technology Education ResearchUnited States
Journal of Research on Technology in EducationUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Learning Media and Technology
Learning Media and Technology · 1×
×1.718.8kEDUCA
×0.64.2kSPS
×1.37.5kIS
×1.35.1kCSA
×2.26.6kDEP
Citations per year, relative to Learning Media and Technology
Learning Media and Technology · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Learning Media and Technology
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Learning Media and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Learning Media and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Learning Media and Technology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Learning Media and Technology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Learning Media and Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Learning Media and Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.