This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bullen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bullen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bullen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bullen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bullen. The network helps show where Mark Bullen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Bullen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Bullen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Bullen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Bullen. Mark Bullen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gallardo-Echenique, Eliana, Mark Bullen, & Luis Marqués Molías. (2016). Student Communication and Study Habits of First-Year University Students in the Digital Era.. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 42(1).12 indexed citations
3.
Bullen, Mark & Tannis Morgan. (2016). Digital learners not digital natives. POLI-RED (Revistas Digitales Politécnicas) (La Universidad Politécnica de Madrid). 60–68.31 indexed citations
Gallardo-Echenique, Eliana, et al.. (2015). El estudiante en la educacin superior: Usos acadmicos y sociales de la tecnologa digital. RUSC Universities and Knowledge Society Journal. 12(1). 25–37.2 indexed citations
6.
Bullen, Mark. (2014). Book Review: Selwyn, Neil (2013). Education in a Digital World: Global Perspectives on Technology and Education. New York: Routledge..7 indexed citations
7.
Bullen, Mark. (2014). What is eLearning.1 indexed citations
8.
Bullen, Mark. (2013). Education in a Digital World: Global Perspectives on Technology and Education. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.11 indexed citations
Bullen, Mark, Tannis Morgan, Marc Romero Carbonell, Albert Sangrà, & Montse Guitert Catasús. (2012). Social Use and Educational Practice: Digital Learners and ICT Use in Higher Education. 52–54.1 indexed citations
11.
Bullen, Mark, et al.. (2012). Exploring Group Forming Strategies by Examining Participation Behaviours during Whole Class Discussions. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning. 15(1).5 indexed citations
12.
Bullen, Mark, Tannis Morgan, & Adnan Qayyum. (2011). Digital Learners in Higher Education: Looking Beyond Stereotypes. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2011(1). 678–687.4 indexed citations
13.
Carbonell, Marc Romero, Montse Guitert Catasús, Mark Bullen, & Tannis Morgan. (2011). Learning in digital: an approach to digital learners in the UOC scenario. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning. 14(2).12 indexed citations
Bullen, Mark. (1999). Technology meets Pedagogy in Online Distance Education. World Conference on WWW and Internet. 1999(1). 1207–1208.2 indexed citations
19.
Bullen, Mark. (1999). What’s the Difference: A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education by Ronald Phipps and Jamie Merisotis. International journal of e-learning & distance education. 14(1). 109–112.5 indexed citations
20.
Bullen, Mark. (1998). PARTICIPATION AND CRITICAL THINKING IN ONLINE UNIVERSITY DISTANCE EDUCATION. International journal of e-learning & distance education. 13(2). 1–32.271 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.