Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Roland G. Tharp
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Roland G. Tharp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roland G. Tharp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roland G. Tharp more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roland G. Tharp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roland G. Tharp. The network helps show where Roland G. Tharp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roland G. Tharp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roland G. Tharp.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roland G. Tharp based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roland G. Tharp. Roland G. Tharp is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tharp, Roland G. & Arnold Meadow. (2017). Differential change in folk disease concepts. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology. 7.
2.
Tharp, Roland G., Cathie Jordan, Gisela E. Speidel, et al.. (2007). Education and Native Hawaiian Children: Revisiting KEEP.8 indexed citations
3.
Tharp, Roland G.. (2006). Four Hundred Years of Evidence: Culture, Pedagogy, and Native America.29 indexed citations
4.
Tharp, Roland G.. (2005). Activity Setting Observation System Rule Book. eScholarship (California Digital Library).1 indexed citations
5.
Doherty, R. William, et al.. (2003). Five Standards and Student Achievement. 1(1).55 indexed citations
6.
Tharp, Roland G., et al.. (2003). From High Chair to High School: Research-Based Principles for Teaching Complex Thinking.. Young children. 58(5). 38–44.7 indexed citations
7.
Tharp, Roland G.. (2003). Introduction. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community. 25(2). 1–11.1 indexed citations
Hilberg, R. Soleste & Roland G. Tharp. (2002). Theoretical Perspectives, Research Findings, and Classroom Implications of the Learning Styles of American Indian and Alaska Native Students. eScholarship (California Digital Library).32 indexed citations
10.
Tharp, Roland G. & Lois A. Yamauchi. (2000). Instructional Conversations in Native American Classrooms. Rural, Urban and Minority Education.. 7(5). 33–37.2 indexed citations
Tharp, Roland G. & Ronald Gallimore. (1989). ROUSING SCHOOLS TO LIFE. 13(2).33 indexed citations
13.
Tharp, Roland G. & Ronald Gallimore. (1982). Inquiry process in program development. Journal of Community Psychology. 10(2). 103–118.30 indexed citations
Tharp, Roland G.. (1964). Reply to Levinger's note.. Psychological Bulletin. 61(2). 158–160.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.