R. William Doherty

1.3k total citations
11 papers, 845 citations indexed

About

R. William Doherty is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, R. William Doherty has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 845 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Education, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in R. William Doherty's work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (4 papers), Education and Technology Integration (3 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). R. William Doherty is often cited by papers focused on Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (4 papers), Education and Technology Integration (3 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). R. William Doherty collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. R. William Doherty's co-authors include R. Soleste Hilberg, Elaine Hatfield, Roland G. Tharp, Theodore M. Singelis and Lance M. McCracken and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Journal of Pain, Psychology of Women Quarterly and Motivation and Emotion.

In The Last Decade

R. William Doherty

10 papers receiving 758 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
R. William Doherty United States	8	343	203	190	163	155	11	845
Vanda Zammuner Italy	15	475 1.4×	235 1.2×	293 1.5×	98 0.6×	247 1.6×	42	922
Pamela Sadler Canada	19	468 1.4×	253 1.2×	391 2.1×	274 1.7×	342 2.2×	35	1.3k
Victor Bissonnette United States	11	475 1.4×	233 1.1×	238 1.3×	162 1.0×	244 1.6×	16	860
Belén López‐Pérez United Kingdom	18	455 1.3×	192 0.9×	359 1.9×	173 1.1×	152 1.0×	68	934
Binghai Sun China	15	244 0.7×	141 0.7×	129 0.7×	128 0.8×	72 0.5×	49	635
William Nasby United States	14	446 1.3×	259 1.3×	403 2.1×	211 1.3×	252 1.6×	31	959
Scott H. Hemenover United States	14	519 1.5×	200 1.0×	459 2.4×	176 1.1×	397 2.6×	22	1.1k
Jerome Tobacyk United States	19	1.2k 3.4×	213 1.0×	215 1.1×	226 1.4×	212 1.4×	76	1.6k
Susan A. Andrzejewski United States	13	325 0.9×	337 1.7×	156 0.8×	131 0.8×	163 1.1×	17	863
Stefano I. Di Domenico Canada	14	331 1.0×	102 0.5×	199 1.0×	184 1.1×	218 1.4×	27	849

Countries citing papers authored by R. William Doherty

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. William Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. William Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. William Doherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. William Doherty

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. William Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. William Doherty. The network helps show where R. William Doherty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. William Doherty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. William Doherty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. William Doherty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. William Doherty. R. William Doherty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

McCracken, Lance M., et al.. (2013). The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Clinical Journal of Pain. 30(10). 894–901. 67 indexed citations

2.

Doherty, R. William, et al.. (2013). The cognitive fusion questionnaire: a preliminary study of psychometric properties and prediction of functioning in chronic pain. 4. 4 indexed citations

3.

Doherty, R. William & R. Soleste Hilberg. (2008). Efficacy of Five Standards in Raising Student Achievement: Findings From Three Studies. The Journal of Educational Research. 101(4). 195–206. 4 indexed citations

4.

Doherty, R. William & R. Soleste Hilberg. (2007). Standards for Effective Pedagogy, Classroom Organization, English Proficiency, and Student Achievement. The Journal of Educational Research. 101(1). 24–35. 31 indexed citations

5.

Doherty, R. William, et al.. (2003). Five Standards and Student Achievement. 1(1). 55 indexed citations

6.

Doherty, R. William, et al.. (2002). Standards Performance Continuum: Development and Validation of a Measure of Effective Pedagogy. The Journal of Educational Research. 96(2). 78–89. 58 indexed citations

7.

Doherty, R. William. (1998). Emotional Contagion and Social Judgment. Motivation and Emotion. 22(3). 187–209. 50 indexed citations

8.

Doherty, R. William. (1997). The Emotional Contagion Scale: A Measure of Individual Differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 21(2). 131–154. 398 indexed citations

9.

Doherty, R. William, et al.. (1995). Emotional Contagion. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 19(3). 355–371. 135 indexed citations

10.

Doherty, R. William, et al.. (1994). Cultural and ethnic influences on love and attachment. Personal Relationships. 1(4). 391–398. 42 indexed citations

11.

Doherty, R. William. (1985). Education and employment: What's gone wrong?. International Review of Education. 31(1). 465–467. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact