Countries citing papers authored by Robert F. Cavanagh
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert F. Cavanagh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert F. Cavanagh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert F. Cavanagh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert F. Cavanagh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert F. Cavanagh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert F. Cavanagh. The network helps show where Robert F. Cavanagh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert F. Cavanagh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert F. Cavanagh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert F. Cavanagh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert F. Cavanagh. Robert F. Cavanagh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Johnson, Julia, Genevieve Marie Johnson, & Robert F. Cavanagh. (2012). Rough Sets for Mining Educational Data. eSpace (Curtin University). 3. 1–4.1 indexed citations
5.
Harbaugh, Allen G. & Robert F. Cavanagh. (2012). Associations between the classroom learning environment and student engagement in learning 2: A structural equation modeling approach. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University).3 indexed citations
6.
Harbaugh, Allen G. & Robert F. Cavanagh. (2012). Associations between the Classroom Learning Environment and Student Engagement in Learning 2: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. eSpace (Curtin University). 1–10.5 indexed citations
Cavanagh, Robert F., et al.. (2005). Pedagogic Leadership: Refocusing on Learning and Teaching.. 9(2).20 indexed citations
10.
Cavanagh, Robert F., et al.. (2005). Parent views of involvement in their child's education: A Rasch model analysis. 2–15.3 indexed citations
11.
Cavanagh, Robert F., et al.. (2004). Understanding what principals value about leadership, teaching and learning: A philosophical approach. eSpace (Curtin University). 1–11.2 indexed citations
12.
Cavanagh, Robert F., et al.. (2004). Information and communication technology learning in the classroom: The influence of students, the class-group, teachers and the home.3 indexed citations
13.
Cavanagh, Robert F., et al.. (2004). DEVELOPMENT OF A RASCH MODEL SCALE TO MEASURE TEACHER OBSERVATIONS OF HOW PRINCIPALS LEAD THE SCHOOL PEDAGOGY.
14.
Cavanagh, Robert F., et al.. (2003). APPLICATION OF RASCH MODEL AND TRADITIONAL STATISTICS TO DEVELOP A MEASURE OF PRIMARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM LEARNING CULTURE.4 indexed citations
15.
Cavanagh, Robert F., et al.. (2003). DEVELOPMENT OF A RASCH MODEL SCALE TO MEASURE STUDENT INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY LEARNING SELF-REPORTED OUTCOMES, BEHAVIOURS AND ATTITUDES.3 indexed citations
16.
Cavanagh, Robert F., et al.. (2003). Pedagogic principal leadership. Management in Education. 17(4). 14–17.14 indexed citations
Cavanagh, Robert F.. (1995). Devolution from the perspective of school culture. 17(4). 8.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.