Richard C. Omanson

2.0k total citations
20 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Richard C. Omanson is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard C. Omanson has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Richard C. Omanson's work include Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers). Richard C. Omanson is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers). Richard C. Omanson collaborates with scholars based in United States. Richard C. Omanson's co-authors include Arthur C. Graesser, Isabel L. Beck, Margaret G. McKeown, Charles A. Perfetti, William H. Warren, John H. Flavell, Craig S. Miller, James F. Voss and Elizabeth Young and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Developmental Psychology and The American Journal of Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Richard C. Omanson

19 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard C. Omanson United States 12 998 351 255 229 209 20 1.3k
Frank R. Yekovich United States 15 698 0.7× 450 1.3× 190 0.7× 268 1.2× 318 1.5× 27 1.3k
Eileen Kintsch United States 14 1.1k 1.1× 553 1.6× 528 2.1× 180 0.8× 347 1.7× 17 1.6k
Sandra S. Smiley United States 12 998 1.0× 409 1.2× 163 0.6× 263 1.1× 359 1.7× 20 1.3k
Peter Winograd United States 17 1.2k 1.2× 883 2.5× 123 0.5× 103 0.4× 201 1.0× 40 1.6k
Yasuhiro Ozuru United States 15 906 0.9× 400 1.1× 312 1.2× 184 0.8× 200 1.0× 24 1.3k
Jana M. Mason United States 22 1.3k 1.3× 1.0k 2.9× 96 0.4× 120 0.5× 211 1.0× 73 1.9k
Michael F. Graves United States 22 1.2k 1.2× 723 2.1× 157 0.6× 65 0.3× 111 0.5× 97 1.6k
Tenaha O’Reilly United States 25 1.4k 1.4× 800 2.3× 436 1.7× 179 0.8× 202 1.0× 75 2.0k
Karen K. Wixson United States 18 1.3k 1.3× 1.1k 3.1× 96 0.4× 94 0.4× 145 0.7× 47 1.8k
Bonnie B. Armbruster United States 21 908 0.9× 731 2.1× 140 0.5× 45 0.2× 190 0.9× 56 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Richard C. Omanson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard C. Omanson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard C. Omanson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard C. Omanson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard C. Omanson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard C. Omanson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard C. Omanson. The network helps show where Richard C. Omanson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard C. Omanson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard C. Omanson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard C. Omanson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard C. Omanson. Richard C. Omanson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Omanson, Richard C., et al.. (2014). Effects of Item Grouping on Selection Efficiency. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 58(1). 1526–1530.
2.
Beck, Isabel L., Margaret G. McKeown, & Richard C. Omanson. (2014). The Effects and Uses of Diverse Vocabulary Instructional Techniques. 161–178. 41 indexed citations
3.
Miller, Craig S., et al.. (2011). Categorization costs for hierarchical keyboard commands. 2765–2768. 5 indexed citations
4.
Omanson, Richard C., et al.. (2010). Comparison of Mouse and Keyboard Efficiency. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 54(6). 600–604. 10 indexed citations
5.
Omanson, Richard C., et al.. (1998). Dimensions Affecting Web Site Identity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 42(4). 429–433. 3 indexed citations
6.
Omanson, Richard C.. (1985). Knowing words and understanding texts. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. 1985(27). 35–53. 5 indexed citations
7.
McKeown, Margaret G., et al.. (1985). Some Effects of the Nature and Frequency of Vocabulary Instruction on the Knowledge and Use of Words. Reading Research Quarterly. 20(5). 522–522. 246 indexed citations
8.
Omanson, Richard C., Isabel L. Beck, Margaret G. McKeown, & Charles A. Perfetti. (1984). Comprehension of texts with unfamiliar versus recently taught words: Assessment of alternative models.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 76(6). 1253–1268. 3 indexed citations
9.
Omanson, Richard C., et al.. (1984). The Effects of Reading Lessons on Comprehension: A Processing Description. Cognition and Instruction. 1(1). 45–67. 13 indexed citations
10.
Beck, Isabel L., et al.. (1984). Improving the Comprehensibility of Stories: The Effects of Revisions That Improve Coherence. Reading Research Quarterly. 19(3). 263–263. 82 indexed citations
11.
Omanson, Richard C., Isabel L. Beck, Margaret G. McKeown, & Charles A. Perfetti. (1984). Comprehension of texts with unfamiliar versus recently taught words: Assessment of alternative models.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 76(6). 1253–1268. 10 indexed citations
12.
McKeown, Margaret G., Isabel L. Beck, Richard C. Omanson, & Charles A. Perfetti. (1983). The Effects of Long-Term Vocabulary Instruction on Reading Comprehension: A Replication. Journal of Reading Behavior. 15(1). 3–18. 229 indexed citations
13.
Omanson, Richard C., et al.. (1983). An Analysis of Narratives: Scoring Manual.. 2 indexed citations
14.
Omanson, Richard C. & Arthur C. Graesser. (1982). Prose Comprehension beyond the Word. The American Journal of Psychology. 95(2). 336–336. 383 indexed citations
15.
Beck, Isabel L., Richard C. Omanson, & Margaret G. McKeown. (1982). An Instructional Redesign of Reading Lessons: Effects on Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly. 17(4). 462–462. 73 indexed citations
16.
Omanson, Richard C.. (1982). An analysis of narratives: Identifying central, supportive, and distracting content∗. Discourse Processes. 5(3-4). 195–224. 74 indexed citations
17.
Omanson, Richard C.. (1982). The relation between Centrality and story category variation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 21(3). 326–337. 68 indexed citations
18.
Flavell, John H., et al.. (1978). Solving spatial perspective-taking problems by rule versus computation: A developmental study.. Developmental Psychology. 14(5). 462–473. 14 indexed citations
19.
Flavell, John H., et al.. (1978). Solving spatial perspective-taking problems by rule versus computation: A developmental study.. Developmental Psychology. 14(5). 462–473. 26 indexed citations
20.
Omanson, Richard C., et al.. (1978). Goals, inferential comprehension, and recall of stories by children∗. Discourse Processes. 1(4). 337–354. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026