Regina Boulware‐Gooden

528 total citations
9 papers, 344 citations indexed

About

Regina Boulware‐Gooden is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Linguistics and Language. According to data from OpenAlex, Regina Boulware‐Gooden has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 344 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 6 papers in Education and 1 paper in Linguistics and Language. Recurrent topics in Regina Boulware‐Gooden's work include Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (3 papers) and Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers). Regina Boulware‐Gooden is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (3 papers) and Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers). Regina Boulware‐Gooden collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Regina Boulware‐Gooden's co-authors include R. Malatesha Joshi, Mary Ellen Dahlgren, Paul R. Swank, Dennie L. Smith, Elena L. Grigorenko, Mark Sadoski, Victor L. Willson, Torleiv Høien, Nancy Hill and P. G. Aaron and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Learning Disabilities, Learning Disability Quarterly and Annals of Dyslexia.

In The Last Decade

Regina Boulware‐Gooden

9 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Regina Boulware‐Gooden United States	8	278	203	68	44	43	9	344
Jane Fleming United States	7	249 0.9×	161 0.8×	109 1.6×	22 0.5×	47 1.1×	10	301
J. Lloyd Eldredge United States	10	256 0.9×	170 0.8×	64 0.9×	25 0.6×	29 0.7×	16	291
Peter Schreiber Germany	6	295 1.1×	174 0.9×	57 0.8×	56 1.3×	55 1.3×	19	366
Noelia Pulido García United States	5	323 1.2×	328 1.6×	54 0.8×	66 1.5×	43 1.0×	8	396
HyeJin Hwang United States	9	203 0.7×	157 0.8×	41 0.6×	27 0.6×	21 0.5×	21	281
Miya Miura Wayman United States	8	350 1.3×	196 1.0×	152 2.2×	15 0.3×	32 0.7×	8	428
Peter Dewitz United States	8	199 0.7×	133 0.7×	48 0.7×	24 0.5×	18 0.4×	13	250
Jantien Smit Netherlands	6	143 0.5×	217 1.1×	43 0.6×	33 0.8×	13 0.3×	13	298
Wayne H. Slater United States	11	289 1.0×	208 1.0×	50 0.7×	64 1.5×	23 0.5×	20	383
Kyle Levesque Canada	8	362 1.3×	169 0.8×	175 2.6×	27 0.6×	106 2.5×	15	399

Countries citing papers authored by Regina Boulware‐Gooden

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Regina Boulware‐Gooden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Regina Boulware‐Gooden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regina Boulware‐Gooden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Regina Boulware‐Gooden

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Regina Boulware‐Gooden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Regina Boulware‐Gooden. The network helps show where Regina Boulware‐Gooden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Regina Boulware‐Gooden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Regina Boulware‐Gooden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Regina Boulware‐Gooden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Regina Boulware‐Gooden. Regina Boulware‐Gooden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Boulware‐Gooden, Regina, R. Malatesha Joshi, & Elena L. Grigorenko. (2015). The Role of Phonology, Morphology, and Orthography in English and Russian Spelling. Dyslexia. 21(2). 142–161. 13 indexed citations

Joshi, R. Malatesha, et al.. (2010). Spelling-Related Teacher Knowledge: The Impact of Professional Development on Identifying Appropriate Instructional Activities. Learning Disability Quarterly. 33(3). 148–158. 35 indexed citations

Joshi, R. Malatesha, et al.. (2009). Do Textbooks Used in University Reading Education Courses Conform to the Instructional Recommendations of the National Reading Panel?. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 42(5). 458–463. 36 indexed citations

Boulware‐Gooden, Regina, et al.. (2007). Instruction of Metacognitive Strategies Enhances Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Achievement of Third‐Grade Students. The Reading Teacher. 61(1). 70–77. 143 indexed citations

Joshi, R. Malatesha, et al.. (2007). Drop Everything and Write (DEAW): an innovative program to improve literacy skills. 2(1). 1–12. 3 indexed citations

Boulware‐Gooden, Regina, et al.. (2006). Parsimonious Reading Models: Identifying Teachable Subskills. Reading Psychology. 27(1). 37–58. 28 indexed citations

Joshi, R. Malatesha, et al.. (2005). Learning to Spell by Ear and by Eye: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. 583–592. 7 indexed citations

Sadoski, Mark, et al.. (2004). Verbal and Nonverbal Predictors of Spelling Performance. Journal of Literacy Research. 36(4). 461–478. 13 indexed citations

Joshi, R. Malatesha, Mary Ellen Dahlgren, & Regina Boulware‐Gooden. (2002). Teaching reading in an inner city school through a multisensory teaching approach. Annals of Dyslexia. 52(1). 229–242. 66 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact