Regina Boulware‐Gooden
-
- Reading and Literacy Development 9
- Second Language Acquisition and Learning 2
- Hearing Impairment and Communication 2
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 1
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Writing and Handwriting Education 3
- Education and Technology Integration 2
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
-
- Multilingual Education and Policy 1
-
- Language and cultural evolution 1
- Co-authors
- R. Malatesha JoshiMary Ellen DahlgrenPaul R. SwankDennie L. SmithElena L. GrigorenkoVictor L. WillsonMark SadoskiP. G. Aaron
- Journals
- Journal of Learning Disabilities (1 paper)Learning Disability Quarterly (1 paper)Annals of Dyslexia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Regina Boulware‐Gooden
9 papers receiving 286 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 278
- Statistics and Probability 68
- Education 203
- Language and Linguistics 44
- Linguistics and Language 10
Countries citing papers authored by Regina Boulware‐Gooden
This map shows the geographic impact of Regina Boulware‐Gooden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Regina Boulware‐Gooden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regina Boulware‐Gooden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Regina Boulware‐Gooden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Regina Boulware‐Gooden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Regina Boulware‐Gooden. The network helps show where Regina Boulware‐Gooden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Regina Boulware‐Gooden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 143 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 66 |
About Regina Boulware‐Gooden
Regina Boulware‐Gooden is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Linguistics and Language and Education, having authored 9 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (3 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers), Education and Technology Integration (2 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (2 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (1 paper), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (1 paper) and Language and cultural evolution (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (278 citations), Statistics and Probability (68 citations) and Education (203 citations). Regina Boulware‐Gooden has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R. Malatesha Joshi, Mary Ellen Dahlgren, Paul R. Swank, Dennie L. Smith, Elena L. Grigorenko, Victor L. Willson, Mark Sadoski, P. G. Aaron, Torleiv Høien and Nancy Hill. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Learning Disabilities, Learning Disability Quarterly and Annals of Dyslexia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.