Annals of Dyslexia

649 papers and 19.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 649 papers published in Annals of Dyslexia in the last decades have received a total of 19.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Dyslexia usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (570 papers), Statistics and Probability (240 papers) and Education (226 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (547 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (240 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (145 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Dyslexia are G. Reid Lyon, Nathlie A. Badian, Louisa C. Moats, Hollis S. Scarborough, Sally E. Shaywitz, Bennett A. Shaywitz, Keith E. Stanovich, Maryanne Wolf, Uta Frith and Hugh W. Catts.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Dyslexia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Dyslexia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Dyslexia.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Dyslexia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Dyslexia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Dyslexia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Dyslexia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025