Raymond Wong
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Family Practice top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Paul A. HemmerD. Michael ElnickiMark J. FaganHeather HarrellBrian S. HeistWalter N. KernanJennifer R. KoganLiselotte N. Dyrbye
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers)Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers)Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Raymond Wong
19 papers receiving 334 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 247
- Family Practice 122
- General Health Professions 113
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 50
- Psychiatry and Mental health 50
Countries citing papers authored by Raymond Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Raymond Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raymond Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raymond Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raymond Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raymond Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raymond Wong. The network helps show where Raymond Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raymond Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raymond Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raymond Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Raymond Wong. Raymond Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 54 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Raymond Wong
Raymond Wong is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Emergency Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (122 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (247 citations) and Gender Studies (44 citations). Raymond Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul A. Hemmer, D. Michael Elnicki, Mark J. Fagan, Heather Harrell, Brian S. Heist, Walter N. Kernan, Jennifer R. Kogan, Liselotte N. Dyrbye, Gary Ferenchick and Jed D. Gonzalo. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Academic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.