Raymond Smith

32 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers

Raymond Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 65
  • Social Psychology 236
  • Reproductive Medicine 64
  • Gender Studies 59
  • Cultural Studies 40
Replace Denise Cuthbert with:
Denise Cuthbert Australia
Margaret Terry Orr United States
Shelley M. Park United States
Ellen M. Broido United States
Jeffrey S. Brooks United States
Ming‐Yeh Lee United States
Jane Ribbens United Kingdom
Joshua C. Collins United States
Tom W. Smith United States
Alison I. Griffith Canada
Raymond Smith relative to Denise Cuthbert Australia Denise Cuthbert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Denise Cuthbert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Raymond Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Raymond Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raymond Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raymond Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Raymond Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raymond Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raymond Smith. The network helps show where Raymond Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Raymond Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Raymond Smith Line = papers co-authored together Raymond Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001268
2 199474
3 200555
4 201333
5 196929
6 201325
7 201113
8 201712
9
Towards More Effective Continuing Education and Training for Australian Workers.
201511
10 20219
11 20068
12 19778
13 19717
14 20067
15
Negotiating With the Soviets
19895
16
How adolescents use the media.
19915
17 20185
18 20034
19
10 Mindframes for Leaders: The VISIBLE LEARNING® Approach to School Success.
20204
20 20194

About Raymond Smith

Raymond Smith is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Architecture, Management of Technology and Innovation, General Decision Sciences and Education, having authored 37 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education and Employability (9 papers), Education Systems and Policy (8 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (7 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (2 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (65 citations), Social Psychology (236 citations), Reproductive Medicine (64 citations), Gender Studies (59 citations) and Cultural Studies (40 citations). Raymond Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Joyce Hunter, Shira Maguen, Marya Gwadz, Margaret Rosario, Karen Fog Olwig, Stephen Billett, Michelle Barker, Xiaojun Zeng, Xiangming Zhu and Helge Müller‐Bunz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Workplace Learning, Studies in Continuing Education, International Journal of Lifelong Education, Industrial Law Journal and Vocations and Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026