Rachel Part

435 citations
6 papers · 275 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Career Development and Diversity
    • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Education top 5%
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
    • Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
    • Early Childhood Education and Development

Papers in

Rachel Part

6 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Rachel Part
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Safety Research 54
  • Education 168
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
  • Social Psychology 96
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 44
Replace Annaline Flint with:
Annaline Flint New Zealand
Paula Olszewski‐Kubilius United States
Joost Jansen in de Wal Netherlands
Marianne Mansour Australia
Scott S. Trimble United States
Cora Parrisius Germany
Yasemin Taş Türkiye
Kathleen M. Alley United States
Mee Joo Kim United States
M. Gebauer Germany
Rachel Part relative to Annaline Flint New Zealand Annaline Flint's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Annaline Flint · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Part

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Part's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Part with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Part more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Part

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Part. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Part. The network helps show where Rachel Part may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Rachel Part, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel Part Line = papers co-authored together Rachel Part links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Rachel Part

Rachel Part is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Education and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 6 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (5 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (3 papers), Career Development and Diversity (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Educational Research and Pedagogy (1 paper), Education, Safety, and Science Studies (1 paper), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper) and Educational Environments and Student Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (54 citations), Education (168 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 citations), Social Psychology (96 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (44 citations). Rachel Part has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Harsha N. Perera, Matthew L. Bernacki, Gwen C. Marchand, Peter McIlveen and Sündüs Yerdelen. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Educational Psychology, Science Education and British Journal of Educational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact