Próspero Di Pierro
- Biomaterials top 0.5%
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Raffaele PortaLoredana MarinielloC. Valeria L. GiosafattoAngela SorrentinoPaolo MasiMarilena EspositoGiovanna Rossi‐MárquezReynaldo Villalonga
- Topics
- Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging (40 papers)Proteins in Food Systems (23 papers)Blood properties and coagulation (15 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaChemical CommunicationsJournal of Cleaner Production
- Partner nations
- ItalyMexicoPalestinian Territory
In The Last Decade
Próspero Di Pierro
91 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Biomaterials 1.3k
- Food Science 1.1k
- Plant Science 492
- Molecular Biology 398
- Nutrition and Dietetics 230
Countries citing papers authored by Próspero Di Pierro
This map shows the geographic impact of Próspero Di Pierro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Próspero Di Pierro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Próspero Di Pierro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Próspero Di Pierro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Próspero Di Pierro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Próspero Di Pierro. The network helps show where Próspero Di Pierro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Próspero Di Pierro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Próspero Di Pierro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Próspero Di Pierro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Próspero Di Pierro. Próspero Di Pierro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 54 | |
| 19 | 66 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Próspero Di Pierro
Próspero Di Pierro is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Food Science and Biochemistry, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging (40 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (23 papers) and Blood properties and coagulation (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (1.3k citations), Food Science (1.1k citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (229 citations). Próspero Di Pierro has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Mexico and Palestinian Territory. Frequent co-authors include Raffaele Porta, Loredana Mariniello, C. Valeria L. Giosafatto, Angela Sorrentino, Paolo Masi, Marilena Esposito, Giovanna Rossi‐Márquez, Reynaldo Villalonga, Carlos Regalado‐González and Mohammed Sabbah. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Chemical Communications and Journal of Cleaner Production.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.