Peter Godden

738 total citations
20 papers, 537 citations indexed

About

Peter Godden is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Godden has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 537 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Food Science, 12 papers in Plant Science and 7 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management. Recurrent topics in Peter Godden's work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (15 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (11 papers) and Wine Industry and Tourism (7 papers). Peter Godden is often cited by papers focused on Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (15 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (11 papers) and Wine Industry and Tourism (7 papers). Peter Godden collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Peter Godden's co-authors include Richard Gawel, I. Leigh Francis, Ella Robinson, Mark Gishen, Richard A. Muhlack, Kevin H. Pardon, Alan P. Pollnitz, John K. Field, Chris Curtin and Paul A. Henschke and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Chemistry and Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Peter Godden

20 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Godden Australia 12 448 328 109 84 76 20 537
Maria Teresa Frangipane Italy 13 307 0.7× 275 0.8× 34 0.3× 77 0.9× 131 1.7× 32 509
Mireia Esteruelas Spain 14 778 1.7× 685 2.1× 150 1.4× 109 1.3× 274 3.6× 17 835
Tengzhen Ma China 10 233 0.5× 175 0.5× 46 0.4× 62 0.7× 68 0.9× 18 308
Laura Mercado Argentina 16 727 1.6× 558 1.7× 214 2.0× 149 1.8× 126 1.7× 34 797
Helen E. Holt Australia 14 835 1.9× 694 2.1× 189 1.7× 127 1.5× 301 4.0× 15 908
James Osborne United States 17 640 1.4× 380 1.2× 73 0.7× 106 1.3× 158 2.1× 37 708
Maria Kyraleou Greece 13 351 0.8× 297 0.9× 39 0.4× 114 1.4× 197 2.6× 20 466
Cai Jian China 9 393 0.9× 315 1.0× 41 0.4× 145 1.7× 190 2.5× 25 539
Ana M. Martínez‐Gil Spain 20 788 1.8× 764 2.3× 116 1.1× 176 2.1× 290 3.8× 41 928
Rosario Sánchez‐Gómez Spain 17 537 1.2× 457 1.4× 55 0.5× 90 1.1× 287 3.8× 46 710

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Godden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Godden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Godden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Godden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Godden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Godden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Godden. The network helps show where Peter Godden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Godden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Godden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Godden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Godden. Peter Godden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McRae, Jacqui M., et al.. (2022). Chemical and Sensory Profiles of Sauvignon Blanc Wine Following Protein Stabilization Using a Combined Ultrafiltration/Heat/Protease Treatment. Frontiers in Nutrition. 9. 799809–799809. 5 indexed citations
2.
McRae, Jacqui M., et al.. (2020). Use of ultrafiltration and proteolytic enzymes as alternative approaches for protein stabilisation of white wine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 27(2). 234–245. 18 indexed citations
3.
Godden, Peter, et al.. (2015). Trends in the composition of Australian wine 1984-2014. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 21. 741–753. 11 indexed citations
4.
Gawel, Richard, Peter Godden, Patricia Williamson, & I. Leigh Francis. (2014). Influence of phenolics on white wine quality and style. 7. 1 indexed citations
5.
Robinson, Ella, et al.. (2014). Conference proceedings : 15th Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference, Sydney, New South Wales, 13-18 July 2013. eCommons (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
6.
Muhlack, Richard A., et al.. (2013). Optimising fermentation through simulation. 9. 3 indexed citations
7.
Dambergs, Robert G., Angela M. Sparrow, Anna L. Carew, et al.. (2012). Quality in a cool climate - maceration techniques in Pinot Noir production. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 18–26. 12 indexed citations
8.
Marangon, Matteo, Steven C. Van Sluyter, Ella Robinson, et al.. (2012). Degradation of white wine haze proteins by Aspergillopepsin I and II during juice flash pasteurization. Food Chemistry. 135(3). 1157–1165. 83 indexed citations
9.
Cozzolino, Daniel, Kate A. Lattey, Peter Godden, et al.. (2008). Relationship between wine scores and visible–near-infrared spectra of Australian red wines. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 391(3). 975–981. 23 indexed citations
10.
Gawel, Richard & Peter Godden. (2008). Evaluation of the consistency of wine quality assessments from expert wine tasters. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 14(1). 1–8. 70 indexed citations
11.
Pardon, Kevin H., et al.. (2008). Removal of pesticides from red and white wine by the use of fining and filter agents. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 10(1). 8–16. 25 indexed citations
12.
Curtin, Chris, et al.. (2007). Genetic diversity ofDekkera bruxellensisyeasts isolated from Australian wineries. FEMS Yeast Research. 7(3). 471–481. 68 indexed citations
13.
Gishen, Mark, et al.. (2006). Changes in Australian wine composition-from 1964 to 2004. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
14.
Francis, I. Leigh, Pham Van Hoi, Mark Gishen, et al.. (2005). Objective measures of grape quality - are they achievable?. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 13 indexed citations
15.
Pardon, Kevin H., et al.. (2005). Fate of Pesticides during the Winemaking Process in Relation to Malolactic Fermentation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 53(8). 3023–3026. 54 indexed citations
16.
Walker, R., et al.. (2003). Salinity effects on vines and wines. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 76(865). 200–228. 29 indexed citations
17.
Godden, Peter, et al.. (2002). An evaluation of the technical performance of wine bottle closures. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 44–52. 1 indexed citations
18.
Godden, Peter, et al.. (2001). Wine bottle closures: sensory properties of a Semillon wine -performance up to 20 months post-bottling. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 16(5). 93-95–97-112. 4 indexed citations
19.
Godden, Peter, I. Leigh Francis, John K. Field, et al.. (2001). Wine bottle closures: physical characteristics and effect on composition and sensory properties of a Semillon wine 1. Performance up to 20 months post-bottling. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 7(2). 64–105. 104 indexed citations
20.
Godden, Peter & I. Leigh Francis. (2001). Introduction. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 7(2). 62–63. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026