Paul van Geert

6.1k total citations
123 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Paul van Geert is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul van Geert has authored 123 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 28 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 25 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Paul van Geert's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (28 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (21 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (19 papers). Paul van Geert is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (28 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (21 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (19 papers). Paul van Geert collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Russia and France. Paul van Geert's co-authors include Marijn van Dijk, Henderien Steenbeek, Carolina de Weerth, Elisa Küpers, Dominique Bassano, Gary E. McPherson, Anna Lichtwarck‐Aschoff, Saskia Kunnen, Harke A. Bosma and Sabine Hunnius and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Psychological Review.

In The Last Decade

Paul van Geert

121 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paul van Geert Netherlands 31 1.6k 824 689 610 576 123 3.5k
Maartje E. J. Raijmakers Netherlands 24 981 0.6× 1.0k 1.2× 380 0.6× 869 1.4× 407 0.7× 100 2.8k
Romain Martin Luxembourg 32 1.1k 0.7× 965 1.2× 934 1.4× 417 0.7× 533 0.9× 105 2.8k
Thomas R. Shultz Canada 36 1.5k 1.0× 600 0.7× 386 0.6× 980 1.6× 1.1k 1.9× 161 3.8k
Paras Mehta United States 24 1.4k 0.9× 705 0.9× 1.0k 1.5× 397 0.7× 337 0.6× 68 3.9k
Willis F. Overton United States 30 1.1k 0.7× 565 0.7× 673 1.0× 378 0.6× 628 1.1× 94 2.8k
Anastasia Efklides Greece 31 2.3k 1.5× 1.2k 1.4× 1.5k 2.2× 443 0.7× 920 1.6× 86 4.0k
K. J. Gilhooly United Kingdom 35 1.6k 1.0× 1.8k 2.2× 252 0.4× 2.2k 3.6× 452 0.8× 94 4.7k
Wim De Neys France 40 1.2k 0.7× 833 1.0× 244 0.4× 2.5k 4.1× 668 1.2× 116 5.0k
Roy Freedle United States 20 1.2k 0.8× 562 0.7× 528 0.8× 361 0.6× 166 0.3× 44 2.4k
Yaacov Petscher United States 41 4.0k 2.5× 477 0.6× 2.8k 4.1× 674 1.1× 232 0.4× 184 5.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Paul van Geert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul van Geert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul van Geert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul van Geert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul van Geert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul van Geert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul van Geert. The network helps show where Paul van Geert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul van Geert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul van Geert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul van Geert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul van Geert. Paul van Geert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dijk, Marijn van, et al.. (2018). Trajectories of scientific reasoning: A microgenetic study on children’s inquiry functioning. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(2). 67–85. 5 indexed citations
2.
Geert, Paul van, et al.. (2017). Scaffolding Young Children: The Utility of Mediation in a Classification Test. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 15(42). 441–466.
3.
Steen, Steffie van der, et al.. (2016). Asymmetric Dynamic Attunement of Speech and Gestures in the Construction of Children’s Understanding. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 473–473. 16 indexed citations
4.
Roppolo, Mattia, Saskia Kunnen, Paul van Geert, Anna Mulasso, & Emanuela Rabaglietti. (2015). A quantitative dynamic systems model of health-related quality of life among older adults. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 10. 1755–1755. 4 indexed citations
5.
Vallacher, Robin R., Paul van Geert, & Andrzej Nowak. (2015). The Intrinsic Dynamics of Psychological Process. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 24(1). 58–64. 50 indexed citations
6.
Reitz, Ellen, Daphne van de Bongardt, Laura Baams, et al.. (2015). Project STARS (Studies on Trajectories of Adolescent Relationships and Sexuality): A longitudinal, multi-domain study on sexual development of Dutch adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. 12(5). 613–626. 14 indexed citations
7.
Geert, Paul van. (2014). Dynamic Modeling for Development and Education: From Concepts to Numbers. Mind Brain and Education. 8(2). 57–73. 15 indexed citations
8.
Dijk, Marijn van & Paul van Geert. (2014). The nature and meaning of intraindividual variability in development in the early life span. 37–58. 14 indexed citations
9.
Steenbeek, Henderien & Paul van Geert. (2013). The emergence of learning-teaching trajectories in education: a complex dynamic systems approach.. PubMed. 17(2). 233–67. 50 indexed citations
10.
Küpers, Elisa, Marijn van Dijk, Paul van Geert, & Gary E. McPherson. (2013). A mixed-methods approach to studying co-regulation of student autonomy through teacher–student interactions in music lessons. Psychology of Music. 43(3). 333–358. 27 indexed citations
11.
Dijk, Marijn van, Sabine Hunnius, & Paul van Geert. (2012). The dynamics of feeding during the introduction to solid food. Infant Behavior and Development. 35(2). 226–239. 31 indexed citations
12.
Geert, Paul van. (2011). The Contribution of Complex Dynamic Systems to Development. Child Development Perspectives. 5(4). 273–278. 81 indexed citations
13.
Steenbeek, Henderien & Paul van Geert. (2008). An empirical validation of a dynamic systems model of interaction: do children of different sociometric statuses differ in their dyadic play?. Developmental Science. 11(2). 253–281. 31 indexed citations
14.
Guastello, Stephen J., William Sulis, T. A. Minelli, et al.. (2008). Chaos and Complexity in Psychology. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 151 indexed citations
15.
Geert, Paul van. (2008). The Dynamic Systems Approach in the Study of L1 and L2 Acquisition: An Introduction. Modern Language Journal. 92(2). 179–199. 116 indexed citations
16.
Hunnius, Sabine, Reint H. Geuze, & Paul van Geert. (2005). Associations between the developmental trajectories of visual scanning and disengagement of attention in infants. Infant Behavior and Development. 29(1). 108–125. 33 indexed citations
17.
Geert, Paul van, et al.. (2003). Handboek ontwikkelingspsychologie : grondslagen en theorieën. 2 indexed citations
18.
Weerth, Carolina de, Paul van Geert, & Herbert Hoijtink. (1999). Intraindividual variability in infant behavior.. Developmental Psychology. 35(4). 1102–1112. 42 indexed citations
19.
Geert, Paul van. (1996). Growth dynamics in development. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 313–337. 17 indexed citations
20.
Gelder, Béatrice de & Paul van Geert. (1982). Knowledge and representation. Routledge eBooks. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026