Psychological Review

3.8k papers and 776.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.8k papers published in Psychological Review in the last decades have received a total of 776.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychological Review usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (617 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (613 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Animal Learning Development (288 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (262 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (260 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychological Review are Albert Bandura, George Miller, Adhityawarman Menaldi, Amos Tversky, James L. McClelland, Hazel Rose Markus, Shinobu Kitayama, Roger Ratcliff, Terrie E. Moffitt and Richard M. Shiffrin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychological Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychological Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychological Review.

Countries where authors publish in Psychological Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychological Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychological Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychological Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025