Robert A. M. Gregson

97 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Robert A. M. Gregson
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Sensory Systems 176
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 235
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 348
  • General Psychology 22
  • General Decision Sciences 23
Replace Gösta Ekman with:
Gösta Ekman Sweden
Paul Thomas Young United States
Scott Parker United States
Tarow Indow Japan
Dwight W. Curtis Canada
Hannes Eisler Sweden
Benny Shanon Israel
Susan Blackmore United Kingdom
Robert E. Morin United States
Stanley J. Rule Canada
Robert A. M. Gregson relative to Gösta Ekman Sweden Gösta Ekman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gösta Ekman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert A. M. Gregson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert A. M. Gregson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert A. M. Gregson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert A. M. Gregson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert A. M. Gregson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert A. M. Gregson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert A. M. Gregson. The network helps show where Robert A. M. Gregson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert A. M. Gregson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert A. M. Gregson Line = papers co-authored together Robert A. M. Gregson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008152
2
Psychometrics of similarity
197571
3 198157
4 197754
5 199353
6 198452
7 196541
8 199338
9 199032
10 199326
11 197325
12 197624
13 197322
14 196221
15 199120
16 196317
17 199517
18 197917
19 198016
20 199616

About Robert A. M. Gregson

Robert A. M. Gregson is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 102 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (27 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (16 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (12 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (9 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (8 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (176 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (235 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (348 citations), General Psychology (22 citations) and General Decision Sciences (23 citations). Robert A. M. Gregson has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Max Abbott, Geoffrey Taylor, John C. Baird, G.Richard Gates, Paul N. Russell, Barrie Stacey, Michael W. Ross, Erika Lunkenheimer, Geoff Hollis and Kevin Dooley. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, Chemical Senses, Acta Psychologica, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and British Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact