Nancy E. Day

24 papers receiving 922 citations

Peers

Nancy E. Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 412
  • Gender Studies 354
  • Public Administration 83
  • Social Psychology 316
  • Information Systems and Management 60
Replace Donna Chrobot‐Mason with:
Donna Chrobot‐Mason United States
Greg J. Sears Canada
Jack W. Wiley United States
Romila Singh United States
Susan L. Kirby United States
Roxana Barbulescu France
M. M. Petty United States
Sabrina D. Volpone United States
Dennis P. Bozeman United States
Jacqueline Landau United States
Nancy E. Day relative to Donna Chrobot‐Mason United States Donna Chrobot‐Mason's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Donna Chrobot‐Mason · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy E. Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy E. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy E. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy E. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy E. Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy E. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy E. Day. The network helps show where Nancy E. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Nancy E. Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy E. Day Line = papers co-authored together Nancy E. Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991219
2 1997217
3 2000147
4 200873
5 201171
6 200545
7 201042
8 200039
9 201234
10 201134
11 199130
12 200728
13 201111
14 20179
15 20088
16 20178
17
Performance in salespeople: The impact of age.
19937
18
Advertising : information or manipulation?
19996
19 19706
20 19955

About Nancy E. Day

Nancy E. Day is a scholar working on Public Administration, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Gender Studies, Health and Accounting, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (4 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (2 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (412 citations), Gender Studies (354 citations), Public Administration (83 citations), Social Psychology (316 citations) and Information Systems and Management (60 citations). Nancy E. Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Patricia A. Schoenrade, Mark A. Huselid, Patricia G. Greene, Tracy H. Porter, Joy V. Peluchette and D. Brent Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of managerial issues, Personnel Review and Organizational Behavior Teaching Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026