Nancy E. Day

1.4k total citations
25 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Nancy E. Day is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Nancy E. Day has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 6 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Nancy E. Day's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers). Nancy E. Day is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers). Nancy E. Day collaborates with scholars based in United States. Nancy E. Day's co-authors include Patricia A. Schoenrade, Mark A. Huselid, Patricia G. Greene, Tracy H. Porter, Joy V. Peluchette and D. Brent Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Personnel Psychology and Human Resource Management.

In The Last Decade

Nancy E. Day

24 papers receiving 922 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nancy E. Day United States	12	412	354	338	316	91	25	1.0k
Donna Chrobot‐Mason United States	18	525 1.3×	587 1.7×	505 1.5×	284 0.9×	93 1.0×	33	1.2k
Greg J. Sears Canada	18	436 1.1×	281 0.8×	259 0.8×	215 0.7×	63 0.7×	30	938
Tammy MacLean United States	11	274 0.7×	305 0.9×	390 1.2×	243 0.8×	112 1.2×	20	969
Michael K. Judiesch United States	11	467 1.1×	417 1.2×	519 1.5×	272 0.9×	138 1.5×	16	1.1k
Susan L. Kirby United States	16	334 0.8×	271 0.8×	239 0.7×	393 1.2×	55 0.6×	24	998
Jack W. Wiley United States	12	635 1.5×	247 0.7×	353 1.0×	162 0.5×	101 1.1×	22	1.1k
Joel Lefkowitz United States	17	475 1.2×	198 0.6×	407 1.2×	246 0.8×	125 1.4×	50	1.1k
Roxana Barbulescu France	5	473 1.1×	302 0.9×	348 1.0×	134 0.4×	103 1.1×	14	1.0k
Frank Linnehan United States	14	293 0.7×	349 1.0×	303 0.9×	198 0.6×	52 0.6×	29	806
Sabrina D. Volpone United States	17	486 1.2×	338 1.0×	384 1.1×	180 0.6×	131 1.4×	40	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy E. Day

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy E. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy E. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy E. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy E. Day

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy E. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy E. Day. The network helps show where Nancy E. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy E. Day

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy E. Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy E. Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy E. Day. Nancy E. Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Day, Nancy E., et al.. (2021). Measuring Bullying in Sexual Minorities: Testing Two Bullying Scales in an LGB Sample. Journal of Homosexuality. 69(7). 1160–1184. 3 indexed citations

2.

Porter, Tracy H., et al.. (2020). Does sexual orientation of bullying target influence bystander response?. 39(1). 17–33. 2 indexed citations

3.

Porter, Tracy H., et al.. (2020). Does sexual orientation of bullying target influence bystander response?. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 39(1). 17–33.

4.

Day, Nancy E. & Tracy H. Porter. (2017). Lacerations of the Soul: Rejection-Sensitive Business School Faculty and Perceived Publication Performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 25(1). 101–115. 8 indexed citations

5.

Porter, Tracy H., et al.. (2017). City of Discontent? The Influence of Perceived Organizational Culture, LMX, and Newcomer Status on Reported Bullying in a Municipal Workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 30(2). 119–141. 9 indexed citations

6.

Day, Nancy E.. (2012). Pay Equity as a Mediator of the Relationships Among Attitudes and Communication About Pay Level Determination and Pay Secrecy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 19(4). 462–476. 34 indexed citations

7.

Day, Nancy E., et al.. (2011). US small company leaders' religious motivation and other‐directed organizational values. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. 17(4). 361–379. 11 indexed citations

8.

Day, Nancy E.. (2011). Perceived pay communication, justice and pay satisfaction. Employee Relations. 33(5). 476–497. 34 indexed citations

9.

Day, Nancy E., et al.. (2010). Student or situation? Personality and classroom context as predictors of attitudes about business school cheating. Social Psychology of Education. 14(2). 261–282. 42 indexed citations

10.

Day, Nancy E. & Joy V. Peluchette. (2008). Do We Practice What We Preach?. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 15(3). 275–286. 8 indexed citations

11.

Day, Nancy E. & Patricia G. Greene. (2008). A case for sexual orientation diversity management in small and large organizations. Human Resource Management. 47(3). 637–654. 73 indexed citations

12.

Day, Nancy E., et al.. (2000). Teaching Diversity: A Study of Organizational Needs and Diversity Curriculum in Higher Education. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. 24(3). 338–352. 39 indexed citations

13.

Day, Nancy E. & Patricia A. Schoenrade. (2000). The relationship among reported disclosure of sexual orientation, anti‐discrimination policies, top management support and work attitudes of gay and lesbian employees. Personnel Review. 29(3). 346–363. 147 indexed citations

14.

Day, Nancy E.. (1999). Advertising : information or manipulation?. Internet Archive (Internet Archive). 6 indexed citations

15.

Day, Nancy E. & Patricia A. Schoenrade. (1997). STAYING IN THE CLOSET VERSUS COMING OUT: RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN COMMUNICATION ABOUT SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND WORK ATTITUDES. Personnel Psychology. 50(1). 147–163. 217 indexed citations

16.

Day, Nancy E.. (1995). Can Performance Raters Be More Accurate? Investigating the Benefits of Prior Knowledge of Performance Dimensions. Journal of managerial issues. 7(3). 323–9. 5 indexed citations

17.

Day, Nancy E.. (1994). Animal experimentation : cruelty or science?. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 1 indexed citations

18.

Day, Nancy E.. (1993). Performance in salespeople: The impact of age.. Journal of managerial issues. 7 indexed citations

19.

Huselid, Mark A. & Nancy E. Day. (1991). Organizational commitment, job involvement, and turnover: A substantive and methodological analysis.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 76(3). 380–391. 219 indexed citations

20.

Huselid, Mark A. & Nancy E. Day. (1991). Organizational commitment, job involvement, and turnover: A substantive and methodological analysis.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 76(3). 380–391. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact