Nadia Chammem

28 total papers · 767 total citations
22 papers, 559 citations indexed

About

Nadia Chammem is a scholar working on Food Science, Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia Chammem has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 559 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Food Science, 9 papers in Biochemistry and 8 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Nadia Chammem's work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (9 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (7 papers) and Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (7 papers). Nadia Chammem is often cited by papers focused on Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (9 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (7 papers) and Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (7 papers). Nadia Chammem collaborates with scholars based in Tunisia, Portugal and Spain. Nadia Chammem's co-authors include Amélia Martins Delgado, Manel Issaoui, Moktar Hamdi, Inés Sifaoui, Mondher Mejri, Fathi Moussa, José E. Piñero, Jacob Lorenzo‐Morales, Sana M’hir and Atteneri López‐Arencibia and has published in prestigious journals such as Bioresource Technology, Food Chemistry and Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.

In The Last Decade

Nadia Chammem

22 papers receiving 547 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Nadia Chammem 254 151 142 125 114 22 559
Mitra Rezaie 262 1.0× 132 0.9× 64 0.5× 131 1.0× 128 1.1× 32 647
Vaida Kitrytė 284 1.1× 328 2.2× 79 0.6× 136 1.1× 118 1.0× 22 689
Vasilisa Pedan 231 0.9× 137 0.9× 69 0.5× 69 0.6× 58 0.5× 18 526
Huri İlyasoğlu 285 1.1× 132 0.9× 117 0.8× 115 0.9× 85 0.7× 36 556
Clotilde Zappia 275 1.1× 200 1.3× 147 1.0× 201 1.6× 83 0.7× 19 611
Marco Capocasale 263 1.0× 232 1.5× 168 1.2× 213 1.7× 86 0.8× 21 658
Julián Lozano‐Castellón 264 1.0× 237 1.6× 322 2.3× 138 1.1× 114 1.0× 31 634
Mara Mandrioli 166 0.7× 80 0.5× 76 0.5× 188 1.5× 127 1.1× 32 626
S. S. Deshpande 181 0.7× 186 1.2× 105 0.7× 240 1.9× 119 1.0× 23 687
Paulina Tapia-Quirós 219 0.9× 215 1.4× 112 0.8× 104 0.8× 78 0.7× 12 531

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Chammem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Chammem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Chammem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Chammem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Chammem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Chammem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Chammem. The network helps show where Nadia Chammem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Chammem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Chammem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Chammem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Chammem. Nadia Chammem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026