Deborah LaBelle

487 citations
6 papers · 356 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Teaching and Learning Programming 3
    • Online Learning and Analytics 3
    • Online and Blended Learning 1
    • Child Development and Digital Technology 1
    • Education and Technology Integration 1
Journals
Feminist Studies (1 paper)ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (1 paper)PPIG (1 paper)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Deborah LaBelle

6 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

Deborah LaBelle
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Computer Science Applications 283
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 149
  • Gender Studies 55
  • Software 18
  • Media Technology 28
Replace Quentin M. Wherfel with:
Quentin M. Wherfel United States
Hilary A. Dwyer United States
Neena Thota Sweden
David Davenport Türkiye
Tatjana Jevsikova Lithuania
Dianne P. Chambers Australia
Eno Tõnisson Estonia
Merijke Coenraad United States
David B. Palumbo United States
Eben B. Witherspoon United States
Deborah LaBelle relative to Quentin M. Wherfel United States Quentin M. Wherfel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Quentin M. Wherfel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah LaBelle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah LaBelle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah LaBelle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah LaBelle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah LaBelle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah LaBelle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah LaBelle. The network helps show where Deborah LaBelle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Deborah LaBelle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah LaBelle Line = papers co-authored together Deborah LaBelle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2004194
2
Factors Affecting Course Outcomes in Introductory Programming
200479
3 200473
4 20045
5 20164
6
Before the Team project: Cultivate a Community of Collaborators
20041

About Deborah LaBelle

Deborah LaBelle is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Education, Gender Studies, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Communication, having authored 6 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper), Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper) and Education and Technology Integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (283 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (149 citations), Gender Studies (55 citations), Software (18 citations) and Media Technology (28 citations). Deborah LaBelle has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan Wiedenbeck, V. Ramalingam and Sheryl Kubiak. Their work appears in journals such as Feminist Studies, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin and PPIG.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact