Milou Silkens

486 citations
28 papers · 243 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Milou Silkens

26 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

Milou Silkens
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Family Practice 41
  • Health Informatics 16
  • Research and Theory 5
  • General Health Professions 131
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 123
Replace Gregory Briscoe with:
Gregory Briscoe United States
Kirsty Freeman Singapore
Rebekah Cole United States
Karen Szauter United States
Amy E. Fleming United States
Abbas Hyderi United States
Julie Brice United Kingdom
Peter Weissmann United States
Kazuhiko Fujisaki Japan
Victoria Hayes United States
Milou Silkens relative to Gregory Briscoe United States Gregory Briscoe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Gregory Briscoe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Milou Silkens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Milou Silkens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Milou Silkens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Milou Silkens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Milou Silkens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Milou Silkens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Milou Silkens. The network helps show where Milou Silkens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Milou Silkens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Milou Silkens Line = papers co-authored together Milou Silkens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201529
2 201821
3 202019
4 201617
5 202216
6 201715
7 202315
8 202315
9 202314
10 202113
11 202311
12 20248
13 20227
14 20236
15 20196
16 20235
17 20175
18 20174
19 20223
20 20193

About Milou Silkens

Milou Silkens is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Gender Studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (15 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (11 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (8 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (5 papers), Radiology practices and education (5 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (4 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (4 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (41 citations), Health Informatics (16 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations), General Health Professions (131 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (123 citations). Milou Silkens has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kiki M. J. M. H. Lombarts, Onyebuchi A. Arah, Asta Medišauskaitė, Antonia Rich, Renée A. Scheepers, Maas Jan Heineman, Renée E. Stalmeijer, Albert Scherpbier, Albert J.J.A. Scherpbier and Rowena Viney. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Medical Teacher, Medical Education, BMC Health Services Research and BMC Medical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact