Rowena Viney

587 total citations
21 papers, 359 citations indexed

About

Rowena Viney is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Rowena Viney has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 359 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 5 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Rowena Viney's work include Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (5 papers). Rowena Viney is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (5 papers). Rowena Viney collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Australia. Rowena Viney's co-authors include Ann Griffin, Antonia Rich, Katherine Woolf, Sarah Needleman, Lorraine Noble, Asta Medišauskaitė, Milou Silkens, Jean Clarke, Joep Cornelissen and Israel Berger and has published in prestigious journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, BMJ Open and Organizational Research Methods.

In The Last Decade

Rowena Viney

21 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rowena Viney United Kingdom 10 189 176 131 60 35 21 359
Lisi Gordon United Kingdom 11 201 1.1× 158 0.9× 58 0.4× 39 0.7× 23 0.7× 27 377
Amelia Kehoe United Kingdom 8 152 0.8× 122 0.7× 65 0.5× 82 1.4× 29 0.8× 13 276
Jorge A. Girotti United States 11 169 0.9× 214 1.2× 105 0.8× 62 1.0× 23 0.7× 22 375
Nora Y. Osman United States 11 278 1.5× 94 0.5× 164 1.3× 50 0.8× 14 0.4× 40 411
Koshila Kumar Australia 15 495 2.6× 299 1.7× 151 1.2× 160 2.7× 31 0.9× 42 716
Cheri Bethune Canada 12 249 1.3× 195 1.1× 49 0.4× 72 1.2× 26 0.7× 41 416
Catherine D. Michelson United States 10 190 1.0× 156 0.9× 64 0.5× 39 0.7× 63 1.8× 41 367
Nadine van der Lee Netherlands 9 203 1.1× 166 0.9× 41 0.3× 27 0.5× 28 0.8× 10 350
A. Hal Strelnick United States 14 230 1.2× 223 1.3× 146 1.1× 95 1.6× 59 1.7× 28 490
Jerry M Maniate Canada 9 283 1.5× 153 0.9× 40 0.3× 79 1.3× 18 0.5× 21 418

Countries citing papers authored by Rowena Viney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rowena Viney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rowena Viney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rowena Viney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rowena Viney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rowena Viney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rowena Viney. The network helps show where Rowena Viney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rowena Viney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rowena Viney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rowena Viney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rowena Viney. Rowena Viney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rich, Antonia, Rowena Viney, Milou Silkens, A. Clark Griffin, & Asta Medišauskaitė. (2024). The experiences of students with mental health difficulties at medical school: a qualitative interview study. Medical Education Online. 29(1). 2366557–2366557. 8 indexed citations
2.
Rich, Antonia, Rowena Viney, Milou Silkens, Ann Griffin, & Asta Medišauskaitė. (2023). UK medical students’ mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open. 13(4). e070528–e070528. 15 indexed citations
3.
Silkens, Milou, Kirsty Alexander, Rowena Viney, et al.. (2023). A national qualitative investigation of the impact of service change on doctors’ training during Covid-19. BMC Medical Education. 23(1). 174–174. 1 indexed citations
4.
Medišauskaitė, Asta, Rowena Viney, Antonia Rich, et al.. (2023). Financial difficulty in the medical profession. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 116(5). 160–166. 5 indexed citations
5.
Knight, Laura, et al.. (2023). A realist evaluation of a London general practitioner trainer course. Education for Primary Care. 34(4). 220–227. 2 indexed citations
7.
Medišauskaitė, Asta, Ann Griffin, Rowena Viney, Ahmed Rashid, & Antonia Rich. (2021). Changing professional behaviours: mixed methods study utilising psychological theories to evaluate an educational programme for UK medical doctors. BMC Medical Education. 21(1). 92–92. 4 indexed citations
8.
9.
Noble, Lorraine, et al.. (2020). What does the structure of a medical consultation look like? A new method for visualising doctor-patient communication. Patient Education and Counseling. 104(6). 1387–1397. 15 indexed citations
10.
Noble, Lorraine, et al.. (2020). Patient autonomy in the consultation: How signalling structure can facilitate patient-centred care. Patient Education and Counseling. 103(11). 2269–2279. 8 indexed citations
11.
Crampton, Paul, et al.. (2020). Teaching medical professionalism: a qualitative exploration of persuasive communication as an educational strategy. BMC Medical Education. 20(1). 74–74. 9 indexed citations
12.
Clarke, Jean, et al.. (2019). Gesture Analysis and Organizational Research: The Development and Application of a Protocol for Naturalistic Settings. Organizational Research Methods. 24(1). 140–171. 11 indexed citations
13.
Rich, Antonia, Rowena Viney, & Ann Griffin. (2019). Understanding the factors influencing doctors’ intentions to report patient safety concerns: a qualitative study. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 112(10). 428–437. 12 indexed citations
14.
Woolf, Katherine, et al.. (2019). Assessing professional competence: a critical review of the Annual Review of Competence Progression. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 112(6). 236–244. 12 indexed citations
15.
Woolf, Katherine, et al.. (2018). Organisational perspectives on addressing differential attainment in postgraduate medical education: a qualitative study in the UK. BMJ Open. 8(3). e021314–e021314. 16 indexed citations
17.
Viney, Rowena, Antonia Rich, Sarah Needleman, Ann Griffin, & Katherine Woolf. (2017). The validity of the Annual Review of Competence Progression: a qualitative interview study of the perceptions of junior doctors and their trainers. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 110(3). 110–117. 20 indexed citations
18.
Rich, Antonia, Rowena Viney, Sarah Needleman, Ann Griffin, & Katherine Woolf. (2016). ‘You can't be a person and a doctor’: the work–life balance of doctors in training—a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 6(12). e013897–e013897. 105 indexed citations
19.
Woolf, Katherine, Antonia Rich, Rowena Viney, Sarah Needleman, & Ann Griffin. (2016). Perceived causes of differential attainment in UK postgraduate medical training: a national qualitative study. BMJ Open. 6(11). e013429–e013429. 73 indexed citations
20.
Clarke, Jean, Joep Cornelissen, & Rowena Viney. (2015). Seeing Entrepreneurs in Action: Using Video-based Gesture Analysis in Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015(1). 11921–11921. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026