Joost G. Daams
- Surgery top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Oncology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Anna E. GoudriaanMonique H. W. Frings‐DresenPaul KuijerJohanna W. WilminkGeertjan van TienhovenRamón LindauerMarc G. BesselinkEva Versteijne
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers)Workplace Health and Well-being (7 papers)Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGastroenterologyPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Joost G. Daams
105 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
- Surgery 516
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 509
- General Health Professions 483
- Oncology 440
- Clinical Psychology 425
Countries citing papers authored by Joost G. Daams
This map shows the geographic impact of Joost G. Daams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joost G. Daams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joost G. Daams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joost G. Daams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joost G. Daams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joost G. Daams. The network helps show where Joost G. Daams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joost G. Daams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joost G. Daams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joost G. Daams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joost G. Daams. Joost G. Daams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 89 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 54 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 62 | |
| 19 | 51 | |
| 20 | Comparing the quality of referrals of general practitioners with high and average referral rates: an independent panel review. | 43 |
About Joost G. Daams
Joost G. Daams is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Internal Medicine, having authored 116 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (7 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (59 citations), Neurology (217 citations) and Health Informatics (32 citations). Joost G. Daams has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anna E. Goudriaan, Monique H. W. Frings‐Dresen, Paul Kuijer, Johanna W. Wilmink, Geertjan van Tienhoven, Ramón Lindauer, Marc G. Besselink, Eva Versteijne, Ellen M.A. Smets and Henk F. van der Molen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.