Miles Myers
- Education top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Topics
- Education and Technology Integration (3 papers)Education Systems and Policy (3 papers)Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Miles Myers
16 papers receiving 165 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Education 187
- Literature and Literary Theory 78
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 77
- Sociology and Political Science 38
- Language and Linguistics 36
Countries citing papers authored by Miles Myers
This map shows the geographic impact of Miles Myers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miles Myers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miles Myers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miles Myers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miles Myers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miles Myers. The network helps show where Miles Myers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miles Myers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miles Myers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miles Myers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miles Myers. Miles Myers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Assessing student performance | 35 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Changing Our Minds: Negotiating English and Literacy | 58 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | NCTE's Role in Standards Projects. | 9 |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | When Research Does Not Help Teachers. | 5 |
| 11 | The National Writing Project: Literacy and Teaching. | 1 |
| 12 | The Teacher-Researcher: How to Study Writing in the Classroom | 50 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 82 | |
| 16 | Going Back to Hollister: Conflict in Bilingual/Bicultural Education. | 2 |
| 17 | Five Approaches to the Teaching of Writing. | 7 |
| 18 | The Bay Area Writing Project. | 12 |
| 19 | 0 |
About Miles Myers
Miles Myers is a scholar working on Education, Linguistics and Language and Language and Linguistics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education and Technology Integration (3 papers), Education Systems and Policy (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (78 citations), Education (187 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (77 citations). Miles Myers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Spalding, P. David Pearson, Arthur N. Applebee and Gordon M. Pradl. Their work appears in journals such as College Composition and Communication, Phi Delta Kappan and Assessing Writing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.