Michael G. Williamson

1.6k total citations
42 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Michael G. Williamson is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Decision Sciences and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael G. Williamson has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Safety Research, 17 papers in General Decision Sciences and 13 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Michael G. Williamson's work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (23 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (17 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (7 papers). Michael G. Williamson is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (23 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (17 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (7 papers). Michael G. Williamson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Michael G. Williamson's co-authors include Steven J. Kachelmeier, Geoffrey B. Sprinkle, Jeffrey Hales, Flora H. Zhou, Clara Xiaoling Chen, Ramji Balakrishnan, David Upton, Rick Webb, Todd A. Thornock and Alexander Brüggen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Accounting Research, The Accounting Review and Accounting Organizations and Society.

In The Last Decade

Michael G. Williamson

41 papers receiving 964 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael G. Williamson United States 17 413 375 247 241 187 42 1.0k
E. Michael Bamber United States 16 185 0.4× 856 2.3× 227 0.9× 253 1.0× 232 1.2× 28 1.2k
Christopher P. Agoglia United States 17 236 0.6× 1.2k 3.1× 249 1.0× 413 1.7× 153 0.8× 47 1.5k
M. David Piercey United States 15 173 0.4× 602 1.6× 137 0.6× 141 0.6× 77 0.4× 33 844
Emily E. Griffith United States 13 192 0.5× 754 2.0× 151 0.6× 228 0.9× 65 0.3× 27 1.0k
Victor S. Maas Netherlands 13 257 0.6× 514 1.4× 211 0.9× 443 1.8× 233 1.2× 35 1.0k
Marlys Gascho Lipe United States 15 200 0.5× 871 2.3× 435 1.8× 738 3.1× 191 1.0× 26 1.6k
R. Lynn Hannan United States 17 1.1k 2.7× 681 1.8× 144 0.6× 370 1.5× 176 0.9× 30 1.6k
Tina D. Carpenter United States 15 278 0.7× 912 2.4× 174 0.7× 183 0.8× 55 0.3× 38 1.3k
Christine E. Earley United States 13 150 0.4× 812 2.2× 149 0.6× 344 1.4× 108 0.6× 29 1.2k
Theresa Libby Canada 17 295 0.7× 573 1.5× 303 1.2× 632 2.6× 229 1.2× 48 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael G. Williamson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael G. Williamson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael G. Williamson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael G. Williamson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael G. Williamson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael G. Williamson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael G. Williamson. The network helps show where Michael G. Williamson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael G. Williamson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael G. Williamson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael G. Williamson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael G. Williamson. Michael G. Williamson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Williamson, Michael G., et al.. (2024). The Effect of Total Work-Time Information on a Performance Evaluation Bias against Telecommuting Mothers. The Accounting Review. 100(2). 421–439.
2.
Kachelmeier, Steven J., Alan Webb, & Michael G. Williamson. (2023). Do Performance-Contingent Incentives Help or Hinder Divergent Thinking?. The Accounting Review. 99(2). 229–248. 2 indexed citations
3.
Abbeele, Alexandra Van den, et al.. (2021). Building trust through knowledge sharing: Implications for incentive system design. Accounting Organizations and Society. 93. 101241–101241. 24 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Jeffrey O., et al.. (2021). Group Recruiting Events and Gender Stereotypes in Employee Selection*. Contemporary Accounting Research. 38(4). 2496–2520. 12 indexed citations
5.
Kachelmeier, Steven J., Alan Webb, & Michael G. Williamson. (2020). Do Performance-Contingent Incentives Help or Hinder Divergent Thinking?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
7.
Brüggen, Alexander, et al.. (2017). The Effect of Input and Output Targets for Routine Tasks on Creative Task Performance. The Accounting Review. 93(1). 29–43. 31 indexed citations
8.
Kachelmeier, Steven J., Todd A. Thornock, & Michael G. Williamson. (2015). Communicated Values as Informal Controls: Promoting Quality While Undermining Productivity?. Contemporary Accounting Research. 33(4). 1411–1434. 41 indexed citations
9.
Williamson, Michael G., et al.. (2015). The Effect of Time and Output Targets for Routine Tasks on Creative Task Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
10.
Kachelmeier, Steven J., et al.. (2014). Does Intent Modify Risk-Based Auditing?. The Accounting Review. 89(6). 2181–2201. 20 indexed citations
11.
Webb, Rick, et al.. (2013). Productivity-Target Difficulty, Target-Based Pay, and Outside-the-Box Thinking. The Accounting Review. 88(4). 1433–1457. 56 indexed citations
12.
Chen, Clara Xiaoling, Michael G. Williamson, & Flora H. Zhou. (2012). Reward System Design and Group Creativity: An Experimental Investigation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 9 indexed citations
13.
Hales, Jeffrey, et al.. (2012). Selection Benefits of Stock-Based Compensation for the Rank-and-File. SSRN Electronic Journal. 9 indexed citations
14.
Chen, Clara Xiaoling, Michael G. Williamson, & Flora H. Zhou. (2012). Reward System Design and Group Creativity: An Experimental Investigation. The Accounting Review. 87(6). 1885–1911. 96 indexed citations
15.
Webb, Alan, et al.. (2010). Productivity-Target Difficulty, Performance-Based Pay and Outside-the-Box Thinking. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
16.
Hales, Jeffrey & Michael G. Williamson. (2009). Implicit Employment Contracts: The Limits of Management Reputation for Promoting Firm Productivity. Journal of Accounting Research. 48(1). 51–80. 35 indexed citations
17.
Sprinkle, Geoffrey B., Michael G. Williamson, & David Upton. (2008). The effort and risk-taking effects of budget-based contracts. Accounting Organizations and Society. 33(4-5). 436–452. 81 indexed citations
18.
Williamson, Michael G.. (2006). The effects of expanding employee decision making on contributions to firm value in an implicit contracting setting. UMI Dissertation Services eBooks. 1 indexed citations
19.
Fisher, Joseph G., Sean A. Peffer, Geoffrey B. Sprinkle, & Michael G. Williamson. (2006). THE EFFECTS OF BUDGET LEVELS, PARTICIPATION, AND REPEATED-INTERACTION ON EMPLOYEE EFFORT. 1 indexed citations
20.
Williamson, Michael G.. (2006). The Effects of Expanding Employee Decision Making on Contributions to Firm Value in an Informal Reward Environment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026