M. David Piercey

1.2k total citations
33 papers, 844 citations indexed

About

M. David Piercey is a scholar working on Accounting, General Decision Sciences and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. David Piercey has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 844 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Accounting, 10 papers in General Decision Sciences and 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in M. David Piercey's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (26 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers). M. David Piercey is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (26 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers). M. David Piercey collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Canada. M. David Piercey's co-authors include Mark E. Peecher, Christopher P. Agoglia, Ryan Guggenmos, Jessen L. Hobson, Kendall Bowlin, Thomas Kida, Richard M. Tubbs, Jay S. Rich, Andrew J. Trotman and Jonathan H. Grenier and has published in prestigious journals such as The Accounting Review, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes and Accounting Organizations and Society.

In The Last Decade

M. David Piercey

30 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Countries citing papers authored by M. David Piercey

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. David Piercey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. David Piercey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. David Piercey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. David Piercey

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. David Piercey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. David Piercey. The network helps show where M. David Piercey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. David Piercey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. David Piercey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. David Piercey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. David Piercey. M. David Piercey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

#	Work	Indexed citations
1	What Are “Good” Values of q2? Guidance Based on Experimental Accounting Researchers’ Assessments of Fit 2025 ·The Accounting Review ·(unknown), (unknown), M. David Piercey	0
2	“Throw it in as a Covariate?” Common Problems Using Measured Control Variables in Experimental Research 2022 ·Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory ·M. David Piercey	21
3	Do Investors Prefer Female CEOs in Activist-Targeted Firms? The Role of CEO Gender, Shareholder Activism Type, and Earnings Guidance Disclosure 2022 ·SSRN Electronic Journal ·(unknown), Christopher P. Agoglia, M. David Piercey	1
4	'Throw it in as a Covariate'? Common Problems using Measured Control Variables in Experimental Research 2022 ·SSRN Electronic Journal ·M. David Piercey	3
5	How Simple Changes to Language and Tick Marks Can Curtail the Ghost Ticking of Audit Procedures 2021 ·Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory ·(unknown), M. David Piercey	9
6	Too Big to Comprehend? A Research Note on How Large Number Disclosure Format Affects Voter Support for Government Spending Bills 2019 ·Behavioral Research in Accounting ·(unknown), M. David Piercey	8
7	Would an Audit Judgment Rule Improve Audit Committee Oversight and Audit Quality? 2019 ·Current Issues in Auditing ·(unknown), M. David Piercey	2
8	When Doing Good Backfires: The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility Fit on Long- and Short-Term Investors 2019 ·SSRN Electronic Journal ·(unknown), Christopher P. Agoglia, M. David Piercey	0
9	Does an Audit Judgment Rule Increase or Decrease Auditors' Use of Innovative Audit Procedures? 2019 ·Contemporary Accounting Research ·(unknown), M. David Piercey, Andrew J. Trotman	16
10	Custom Contrast Testing: Current Trends and a New Approach 2018 ·The Accounting Review ·Ryan Guggenmos, M. David Piercey, Christopher P. Agoglia	188
11	Making Sense of Seven Quandaries: Developing a Framework for Custom Contrast Analysis 2016 ·SSRN Electronic Journal ·Ryan Guggenmos, M. David Piercey, Christopher P. Agoglia	1
12	Unintended Consequences of Lowering Disclosure Thresholds 2014 ·The Accounting Review ·(unknown), Christopher P. Agoglia, M. David Piercey	29
13	Internal auditors’ use of interpersonal likability, arguments, and accounting information in a corporate governance setting 2014 ·Accounting Organizations and Society ·(unknown), M. David Piercey	42
14	Managing audits to manage earnings: The impact of diversions on an auditor’s detection of earnings management 2014 ·Accounting Organizations and Society ·(unknown), Thomas Kida, M. David Piercey, (unknown)	32
15	The impact of anecdotal data in regulatory audit firm inspection reports 2013 ·Accounting Organizations and Society ·(unknown), Thomas Kida, M. David Piercey, James F. Smith	14
16	Internal Auditors’ Use of Accounting Information, Arguments and Interpersonal Skills in a Corporate Governance Setting 2011 ·SSRN Electronic Journal ·(unknown), M. David Piercey	2
17	The Effects of a Supervisor’s Active Intervention in Subordinates’ Judgments, Directional Goals, and Perceived Technical Knowledge Advantage on Audit Team Judgments 2010 ·Mark E. Peecher, M. David Piercey, Jay S. Rich, Richard M. Tubbs	4
18	Motivated Reasoning and Verbal vs. Numerical Probability Assessment: Evidence from an Accounting Context 2009 ·SSRN Electronic Journal ·M. David Piercey	4
19	Motivated reasoning and verbal vs. numerical probability assessment: Evidence from an accounting context 2008 ·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes ·M. David Piercey	78
20	Judging Audit Quality in Light of Adverse Outcomes: Evidence of Outcome Bias and Reverse Outcome Bias 2006 ·SSRN Electronic Journal ·Mark E. Peecher, M. David Piercey	29

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact