This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Hamm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Hamm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Hamm more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Hamm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Hamm. The network helps show where Mary Hamm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Hamm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Hamm.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Hamm based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Hamm. Mary Hamm is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hamm, Mary. (2012). Activating Assessment For All Students Differentiated Instruction And Informative Methods In Math And Science. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government).2 indexed citations
2.
Hamm, Mary, et al.. (2011). Shaping the Future with Math, Science, and Technology: Solutions and Lesson Plans to Prepare Tomorrow's Innovators..1 indexed citations
Hamm, Mary, et al.. (2006). Media And Literacy: Learning in the Information Age - Issues, Ideas, And Teaching Strategies.3 indexed citations
5.
Adams, Dennis M. & Mary Hamm. (2005). Redefining Education in the Twenty-First Century: Shaping Collaborative Learning in the Age of Information.1 indexed citations
6.
Adams, Dennis M. & Mary Hamm. (2001). Literacy in a Multimedia Age. Medical Entomology and Zoology.23 indexed citations
7.
Hamm, Mary, et al.. (2000). Literacy, Learning, and Media.. 9(4). 22–27.2 indexed citations
Hamm, Mary & Dennis A. Adams. (1998). Literacy in Science, Technology, and the Language Arts: An Interdisciplinary Inquiry. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
10.
Hamm, Mary, et al.. (1996). Cooperative Learning: Critical Thinking and Collaboration Across the Curriculum. (Second Edition)..2 indexed citations
11.
Adams, Dennis M. & Mary Hamm. (1992). Portfolio Assessment and Social Studies: Collecting, Selecting, and Reflecting on What Is Significant.. Social Education. 56(2).14 indexed citations
Hamm, Mary, et al.. (1991). Diversity Gives Schools Infinite Learning Possibilities.. The School Administrator. 48(4). 20–22.1 indexed citations
14.
Adams, Dennis M. & Mary Hamm. (1990). Cooperative Learning: Critical Thinking and Collaboration Across the Curriculum. Medical Entomology and Zoology.87 indexed citations
Hamm, Mary, et al.. (1988). What Research Says...about Teaching Nuclear War.. Science and Children. 25(6). 37–38.2 indexed citations
17.
Hamm, Mary, et al.. (1988). How Science, Technology and Society Issues Are Presented in Science Textbooks.. Educational research quarterly. 12(2). 30–35.2 indexed citations
18.
Adams, D. K. & Mary Hamm. (1988). Travelling Electronic Highways. Journal of Information Technology. 3(2). 106–109.1 indexed citations
19.
Adams, Dennis M. & Mary Hamm. (1987). Teaching Students Critical Viewing Skills.. 26(3). 29–31.1 indexed citations
20.
Adams, Dennis M. & Mary Hamm. (1986). Filling the Leadership Vacuum: The Need for a National Education Plan.. Educational record. 67(4). 20–23.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.